An 'Entirely-Specific' Situation or a Routine Limitation of the National Autonomy? Slovak pensions XVII of the Czech Constitutional Court

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F16%3A10329828" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/16:10329828 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7471-0_8" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7471-0_8</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7471-0_8" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-94-017-7471-0_8</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

An 'Entirely-Specific' Situation or a Routine Limitation of the National Autonomy? Slovak pensions XVII of the Czech Constitutional Court

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article identifies the reasons which moved the Czech Constitutional Court to declare the judgment of the European Court of Justice in C-399/09 Larultovd concerning the application of social security schemes in unprecedented way as an ultra vires act and to deprive it of binding force within the domestic legal system. The author argues that a more express ECJ's pronouncement about persons discriminated contrary to the respective EC Regulation, its more careful understanding of what exactly the Czech Court's case law was saying and - in particular - a reference by the Czech Court for preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of the EC Regulation could avoid the unfortunate outcome of the case. The limitation of Member States's sovereignty by the European integration requires to make lines between the scope of competences conferred on the EU and the national ones also in the area of judicial power more transparent. This is what the article tries to do: to review the national reservations towards primacy of EU law as questionable, if their justification has not been cleared before by the ECJ.

Název v anglickém jazyce

An 'Entirely-Specific' Situation or a Routine Limitation of the National Autonomy? Slovak pensions XVII of the Czech Constitutional Court

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article identifies the reasons which moved the Czech Constitutional Court to declare the judgment of the European Court of Justice in C-399/09 Larultovd concerning the application of social security schemes in unprecedented way as an ultra vires act and to deprive it of binding force within the domestic legal system. The author argues that a more express ECJ's pronouncement about persons discriminated contrary to the respective EC Regulation, its more careful understanding of what exactly the Czech Court's case law was saying and - in particular - a reference by the Czech Court for preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of the EC Regulation could avoid the unfortunate outcome of the case. The limitation of Member States's sovereignty by the European integration requires to make lines between the scope of competences conferred on the EU and the national ones also in the area of judicial power more transparent. This is what the article tries to do: to review the national reservations towards primacy of EU law as questionable, if their justification has not been cleared before by the ECJ.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Limitations of National Sovereignty through European Integration

ISBN

978-94-017-7471-0

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

125-139

Počet stran knihy

207

Název nakladatele

Springer

Místo vydání

Dordrecht

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—