Review of Awards Under Thailand's Model Bilateral Investment Treaty : Charles University in Prague Faculty of Law Research Paper
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F17%3A10361307" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/17:10361307 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Review of Awards Under Thailand's Model Bilateral Investment Treaty : Charles University in Prague Faculty of Law Research Paper
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Thailand has BITs with 41 countries. Most of these BITs have an "ad hoc" policy for the settlement of disputes. Thailand is not a member of ICSID yet, and in cases where the country has an ongoing arbitration, the terms of reference of the public international law and the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules ("the UNCITRAL Rules") must be applied. Thailand has also considered the possibility to amend awards under BIT because its model does not include definitive clauses regarding award reviews. Therefore, this article aims to scrutinize the review of awards under Thailand's model Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) in accordance with the explanation of the review of awards, the problems in Thailand's practice regarding the review of awards and the process of solving current problems, and the setting up of de lege ferenda for the review of awards in BIT Models.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Review of Awards Under Thailand's Model Bilateral Investment Treaty : Charles University in Prague Faculty of Law Research Paper
Popis výsledku anglicky
Thailand has BITs with 41 countries. Most of these BITs have an "ad hoc" policy for the settlement of disputes. Thailand is not a member of ICSID yet, and in cases where the country has an ongoing arbitration, the terms of reference of the public international law and the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules ("the UNCITRAL Rules") must be applied. Thailand has also considered the possibility to amend awards under BIT because its model does not include definitive clauses regarding award reviews. Therefore, this article aims to scrutinize the review of awards under Thailand's model Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) in accordance with the explanation of the review of awards, the problems in Thailand's practice regarding the review of awards and the process of solving current problems, and the setting up of de lege ferenda for the review of awards in BIT Models.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Prague Law Working Paper Series [online]
ISSN
2336-5811
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2017
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
—
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—