How to Limit Immunity of State Officials from Foreign Criminal Jurisdiction
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F19%3A10402573" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/19:10402573 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198849667.003.0010" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198849667.003.0010</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198849667.003.0010" target="_blank" >10.1093/oso/9780198849667.003.0010</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
How to Limit Immunity of State Officials from Foreign Criminal Jurisdiction
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This chapter aims to shed more light on the question whether international law on immunities is in crisis and, if so, how to overcome the crisis. It will not deal with all kinds of immunities under international law but will focus only on immunity of state officials. Immunity of state officials from foreign criminal jurisdiction is governed by customary international law, whose exact scope is often debatable both in theory and practice, particularly in connection with the reinvigorated international effort to end impunity for the most serious crimes under international law, such as genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, including torture, abduction, and enforced disappearances. The development of international criminal law and justice, from the International Military Tribunal at Nurnberg to the permanent International Criminal Court, indicates exceptions; that is, excluding the official status of perpetrators of crimes under international law as the reason for their immunity from the jurisdiction of these international courts. The argument that immunities do not apply to the perpetrators of crimes under international law, preventing them from sheltering behind their official position, was unequivocally expressed in the judgment of the Nurnberg Tribunal.
Název v anglickém jazyce
How to Limit Immunity of State Officials from Foreign Criminal Jurisdiction
Popis výsledku anglicky
This chapter aims to shed more light on the question whether international law on immunities is in crisis and, if so, how to overcome the crisis. It will not deal with all kinds of immunities under international law but will focus only on immunity of state officials. Immunity of state officials from foreign criminal jurisdiction is governed by customary international law, whose exact scope is often debatable both in theory and practice, particularly in connection with the reinvigorated international effort to end impunity for the most serious crimes under international law, such as genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, including torture, abduction, and enforced disappearances. The development of international criminal law and justice, from the International Military Tribunal at Nurnberg to the permanent International Criminal Court, indicates exceptions; that is, excluding the official status of perpetrators of crimes under international law as the reason for their immunity from the jurisdiction of these international courts. The argument that immunities do not apply to the perpetrators of crimes under international law, preventing them from sheltering behind their official position, was unequivocally expressed in the judgment of the Nurnberg Tribunal.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
How International Law Works in Times of Crisis
ISBN
978-0-19-884966-7
Počet stran výsledku
25
Strana od-do
146-170
Počet stran knihy
331
Název nakladatele
Oxford University Press
Místo vydání
Oxford
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—