Nature of charge for Breach of Budgetary Discipline from Czech Perspective

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F20%3A10383165" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/20:10383165 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=uPz.p-odqy" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=uPz.p-odqy</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/wrlae-2020-0003" target="_blank" >10.2478/wrlae-2020-0003</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Nature of charge for Breach of Budgetary Discipline from Czech Perspective

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article is focused on the issue of the imposition of the charge for the breach of the budgetary discipline and its nature as a criminal sanction for the purposes of the application of the articles 6 and 7 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental freedoms. The author familiarizes the reader with the basics of the Czech regulation, pointing out the specific issue related to the recipients of public subsidies. In this case, the Czech legislator must deal with the issue of the competed public authorities because particular breach of the budgetary discipline can be sanctioned also by a fine levied by the Office for the Protection of Competition. Otherwise, the current regulation of the charge for the breach of the budgetary does not necessarily be in accordance with the principle non bis in idem pursuant to the article 4 of the Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental freedoms if the nature of the charge and fine is criminal. Therefore, this article is also devoted to the application of the Engel criteria to the charge for the breach of the budgetary discipline to provide an answer whether this charge is a criminal sanction, and finally, it describes from the perspective of the application of the non bis in idem principle, how negatively could be affected the imposition of this charge if its nature is identified as a criminal one. Used scientific methods are the analysis, induction, deduction and description.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Nature of charge for Breach of Budgetary Discipline from Czech Perspective

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article is focused on the issue of the imposition of the charge for the breach of the budgetary discipline and its nature as a criminal sanction for the purposes of the application of the articles 6 and 7 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental freedoms. The author familiarizes the reader with the basics of the Czech regulation, pointing out the specific issue related to the recipients of public subsidies. In this case, the Czech legislator must deal with the issue of the competed public authorities because particular breach of the budgetary discipline can be sanctioned also by a fine levied by the Office for the Protection of Competition. Otherwise, the current regulation of the charge for the breach of the budgetary does not necessarily be in accordance with the principle non bis in idem pursuant to the article 4 of the Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental freedoms if the nature of the charge and fine is criminal. Therefore, this article is also devoted to the application of the Engel criteria to the charge for the breach of the budgetary discipline to provide an answer whether this charge is a criminal sanction, and finally, it describes from the perspective of the application of the non bis in idem principle, how negatively could be affected the imposition of this charge if its nature is identified as a criminal one. Used scientific methods are the analysis, induction, deduction and description.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration and Economics [online]

ISSN

2084-1264

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

9

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

36-47

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—