The Curious Case of the Czech Model Bilateral Investment Treaty
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F20%3A10419017" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/20:10419017 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=mfgRCkzoby" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=mfgRCkzoby</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The Curious Case of the Czech Model Bilateral Investment Treaty
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Several years have passed since the peak of backlash against the investor-state dispute settlement system. States have reacted by making changes to their investment policies. The basic way to update their investment policy is to modernise their model bilateral investment treaties (BITs). The updated model BITs would usually replace 'old' traditional provisions (unqualified FET clause, broadly worded substantive standards, provisions lacking sustainable development goals) in favour of 'new' modern provisions (qualified FET, narrowly worded substantive standards, sustainable development goals). The Czech Model BIT went a different way and modernised only some of the provisions while it kept some of the key traditional provisions in place. This unique approach can be partly explained by the country's experience with investment treaty arbitration, by its changing position from solely capital importing country to capital exporting country as well as the country's aim to find balance between the EU trends and its own interests in the fast-evolving universe of investment treaty-making.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The Curious Case of the Czech Model Bilateral Investment Treaty
Popis výsledku anglicky
Several years have passed since the peak of backlash against the investor-state dispute settlement system. States have reacted by making changes to their investment policies. The basic way to update their investment policy is to modernise their model bilateral investment treaties (BITs). The updated model BITs would usually replace 'old' traditional provisions (unqualified FET clause, broadly worded substantive standards, provisions lacking sustainable development goals) in favour of 'new' modern provisions (qualified FET, narrowly worded substantive standards, sustainable development goals). The Czech Model BIT went a different way and modernised only some of the provisions while it kept some of the key traditional provisions in place. This unique approach can be partly explained by the country's experience with investment treaty arbitration, by its changing position from solely capital importing country to capital exporting country as well as the country's aim to find balance between the EU trends and its own interests in the fast-evolving universe of investment treaty-making.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Manchester Journal of International Economic Law [online]
ISSN
1742-3945
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
17
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
20
Strana od-do
383-402
Kód UT WoS článku
000612023600005
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—