Origins of the legal regulation of foreigners in China

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F21%3A10429879" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/21:10429879 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=hkv.0rIlDt" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=hkv.0rIlDt</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Origins of the legal regulation of foreigners in China

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Foreigners in China always stood outside the local culture, including the legal one. Under imperial codification, justice to people of non-Chinese civilisations was to be administered according to their own customs. Already in early last millennium, Chinese introduced for foreigners so-called fanfang regime. Foreigners were concentrated in restricted areas, municipal districts or streets called fanfang. They were subject to their own jurisdiction there. Their national was appointed by the Chinese authorities to exercise the juris-diction. Foreigners were treated as equals to the Chinese only when they were deemed useful to the local monarch. The opposite was true during the times of China&apos;s semi-colonial status between 1842 and 1941 when foreigners took a position above the legal and general culture of China. The situation was reversed, therefore if the foreigners deemed a Chinese useful they treated him as equal.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Origins of the legal regulation of foreigners in China

Popis výsledku anglicky

Foreigners in China always stood outside the local culture, including the legal one. Under imperial codification, justice to people of non-Chinese civilisations was to be administered according to their own customs. Already in early last millennium, Chinese introduced for foreigners so-called fanfang regime. Foreigners were concentrated in restricted areas, municipal districts or streets called fanfang. They were subject to their own jurisdiction there. Their national was appointed by the Chinese authorities to exercise the juris-diction. Foreigners were treated as equals to the Chinese only when they were deemed useful to the local monarch. The opposite was true during the times of China&apos;s semi-colonial status between 1842 and 1941 when foreigners took a position above the legal and general culture of China. The situation was reversed, therefore if the foreigners deemed a Chinese useful they treated him as equal.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

The Lawyer Quarterly

ISSN

1805-8396

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

70-82

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85102737156