Third-party dispute settlement in online content moderation: a necessary compliance requirement for online platforms or a constitutional aberration?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F21%3A10457955" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/21:10457955 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Third-party dispute settlement in online content moderation: a necessary compliance requirement for online platforms or a constitutional aberration?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Online platforms regulate and remove large amounts of illegal and harmful content (from content infringing IP rights to Covid-19 disinformation). Art. 18 of the proposed EU Digital Services Act Regulation ("DSA"), the most significant piece of regulation concerning online platforms, proposes a new system of "online courts" that would resolve any content-related disputes between platforms and their users. The paper discusses Art. 18 DSA (more precisely its version proposed by the European Commission, which is currently in the legislative process), the requirements it will place on dispute settlement bodies and the possible impact of these requirements on their operation and accessibility of such proceedings to users. It also briefly analyses the position of online platforms as defendants in content-related disputes and suggests changes to Art. 18 DSA that could be made to remove the identified shortcomings.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Third-party dispute settlement in online content moderation: a necessary compliance requirement for online platforms or a constitutional aberration?
Popis výsledku anglicky
Online platforms regulate and remove large amounts of illegal and harmful content (from content infringing IP rights to Covid-19 disinformation). Art. 18 of the proposed EU Digital Services Act Regulation ("DSA"), the most significant piece of regulation concerning online platforms, proposes a new system of "online courts" that would resolve any content-related disputes between platforms and their users. The paper discusses Art. 18 DSA (more precisely its version proposed by the European Commission, which is currently in the legislative process), the requirements it will place on dispute settlement bodies and the possible impact of these requirements on their operation and accessibility of such proceedings to users. It also briefly analyses the position of online platforms as defendants in content-related disputes and suggests changes to Art. 18 DSA that could be made to remove the identified shortcomings.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
CHALLENGES OF LAW IN BUSINESS AND FINANCE
ISBN
978-606-95351-1-0
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
200-208
Název nakladatele
ADJURIS-SOC OF JURIDICAL & ADMINISTRATIVE SCI
Místo vydání
BUCHAREST
Místo konání akce
Prague Univ Econ & Business
Datum konání akce
4. 11. 2021
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
EUR - Evropská akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000783778100016