European Arrest Warrant – Mutual Trust and Mistrust Among EU Member States
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F23%3A10464882" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/23:10464882 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=HY_8iFWBtD" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=HY_8iFWBtD</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
European Arrest Warrant – Mutual Trust and Mistrust Among EU Member States
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The Europeanisation process for criminal law still faces many challenges today. The first of them is the concept of state sovereignty in the matter of criminal jurisdiction. The European arrest warrant (EAW) exemplifies the successful Europeanisation of criminal legal procedure. The EAW has introduced a new principle of so - called, surrendering, to another Member State of the European Union, for criminal prosecution. Unlike extradition proceedings, the whole process of surrendering a citizen pursuant to an EAW rests solely with the courts. No review by an executive body is required, as it is presumed that, if surrendered to another Member State, the surrendered person's rights - in particular, their right to a fair trial will not be jeopardised. The EAW, with its attending surrender mechanism, is thus a signifier of mutual trust between Member States.
Název v anglickém jazyce
European Arrest Warrant – Mutual Trust and Mistrust Among EU Member States
Popis výsledku anglicky
The Europeanisation process for criminal law still faces many challenges today. The first of them is the concept of state sovereignty in the matter of criminal jurisdiction. The European arrest warrant (EAW) exemplifies the successful Europeanisation of criminal legal procedure. The EAW has introduced a new principle of so - called, surrendering, to another Member State of the European Union, for criminal prosecution. Unlike extradition proceedings, the whole process of surrendering a citizen pursuant to an EAW rests solely with the courts. No review by an executive body is required, as it is presumed that, if surrendered to another Member State, the surrendered person's rights - in particular, their right to a fair trial will not be jeopardised. The EAW, with its attending surrender mechanism, is thus a signifier of mutual trust between Member States.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
The Lawyer Quarterly
ISSN
1805-8396
e-ISSN
1805-840X
Svazek periodika
13
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
131-142
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85169785322