The Monetary Gold Principle

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F23%3A10475382" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/23:10475382 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=XxK9aWgig9" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=XxK9aWgig9</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Monetary Gold Principle

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The International Court of Justice defined the so-called Monetary Gold Principle already decades ago. Yet, the principle remains one of the most controversial issues. It states that a claim raised by parties to a dispute (in contentious proceedings if in front of the ICJ) may be declared inadmissible if there is a third state whose legal interests in the claim form the very subject-matter of the claim itself. The subsequent case law of the court (and other international judicial mechanisms whose jurisdiction is based on consensual basis) has failed up until now to clarify the exact contours of the principle. As a consequence, it suffers from heavy criticism and if it continues to be interpreted conservatively, it may form a serious obstacle to the functioning of the international dispute settlement judicial mechanisms.Consequently, the principle should be interpreted in a way that will allow for a combination of the principle&apos;s maintenance anf functioning of the judicial bodies applying it. Such way is opened due to the fact that the principle was never found explicitly present in the applicable law, it was rather developed as its interpretative result. Using evolutive interpretation of international law, the article suggests, the above-mentioned conbination is possible and needed.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Monetary Gold Principle

Popis výsledku anglicky

The International Court of Justice defined the so-called Monetary Gold Principle already decades ago. Yet, the principle remains one of the most controversial issues. It states that a claim raised by parties to a dispute (in contentious proceedings if in front of the ICJ) may be declared inadmissible if there is a third state whose legal interests in the claim form the very subject-matter of the claim itself. The subsequent case law of the court (and other international judicial mechanisms whose jurisdiction is based on consensual basis) has failed up until now to clarify the exact contours of the principle. As a consequence, it suffers from heavy criticism and if it continues to be interpreted conservatively, it may form a serious obstacle to the functioning of the international dispute settlement judicial mechanisms.Consequently, the principle should be interpreted in a way that will allow for a combination of the principle&apos;s maintenance anf functioning of the judicial bodies applying it. Such way is opened due to the fact that the principle was never found explicitly present in the applicable law, it was rather developed as its interpretative result. Using evolutive interpretation of international law, the article suggests, the above-mentioned conbination is possible and needed.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law

ISSN

1805-0565

e-ISSN

1805-0999

Svazek periodika

2023

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

14

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

59-78

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85185655690