Ecclesiastical dispute resolution in the diocese of Prague : arbitration proceedings of Vicar general and corrector of the clergy at the turn of 14th and 15th century

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F24%3A10489501" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/24:10489501 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=42jFzzuR-h" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=42jFzzuR-h</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/SHB2024-2-8" target="_blank" >10.5817/SHB2024-2-8</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Ecclesiastical dispute resolution in the diocese of Prague : arbitration proceedings of Vicar general and corrector of the clergy at the turn of 14th and 15th century

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The submission analyses the arbitrary practice within two of the archbishop&apos;s representativeoffices in the diocese of Prague. It focuses on the arbitrary agenda as documented in the Actaiudiciaria and Acta correctoris cleri 1407-1410, which served as judicial records for the vicargeneral and the corrector of the clergy (the ecclesiastical criminal judge). These selected offices provide an insight into the application of general canon law in bohemian practice. Subsequently, the paper addresses three main questions. The first question pertains to terminologyissues and the potential distinction between &quot;Arbiter, arbitrator and amicabilis compositor&quot;before the judge, particularly considering that these terms held distinct meanings under canon law. The second question delves into an overview of the cases and focuses on the statusof arbiters and their compliance with canon law. In the final analysis, the paper explores theprocedural approach of the vicar general and corrector of the clergy, offering insight into thepractices at the turn of the 14th and 15th centuries. Given the nature of out-of-court litigation,the submission also comments on the methods of coercion used in the recorded cases andthe punitive measures applied within the proceedings.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Ecclesiastical dispute resolution in the diocese of Prague : arbitration proceedings of Vicar general and corrector of the clergy at the turn of 14th and 15th century

Popis výsledku anglicky

The submission analyses the arbitrary practice within two of the archbishop&apos;s representativeoffices in the diocese of Prague. It focuses on the arbitrary agenda as documented in the Actaiudiciaria and Acta correctoris cleri 1407-1410, which served as judicial records for the vicargeneral and the corrector of the clergy (the ecclesiastical criminal judge). These selected offices provide an insight into the application of general canon law in bohemian practice. Subsequently, the paper addresses three main questions. The first question pertains to terminologyissues and the potential distinction between &quot;Arbiter, arbitrator and amicabilis compositor&quot;before the judge, particularly considering that these terms held distinct meanings under canon law. The second question delves into an overview of the cases and focuses on the statusof arbiters and their compliance with canon law. In the final analysis, the paper explores theprocedural approach of the vicar general and corrector of the clergy, offering insight into thepractices at the turn of the 14th and 15th centuries. Given the nature of out-of-court litigation,the submission also comments on the methods of coercion used in the recorded cases andthe punitive measures applied within the proceedings.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Studia Historica Brunensia

ISSN

1803-7429

e-ISSN

2336-4513

Svazek periodika

71

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

125-142

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—