Defragmentation of (Private) Law Through the Proportionality Test. A Review Essay on Ondřejek’s Monograph ‘Defragmentation of Law: Reconstruction of Contemporary Law as a System’

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F24%3A10492926" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/24:10492926 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=-i8l7BBTVb" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=-i8l7BBTVb</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Defragmentation of (Private) Law Through the Proportionality Test. A Review Essay on Ondřejek’s Monograph ‘Defragmentation of Law: Reconstruction of Contemporary Law as a System’

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

National legal systems are facing fragmentation, a process that significantly challenges the legal certainty and coherence of law. In this context, my essay reviews Pavel Ondřejek&apos;s new book ‘Defragmentation of Law: Reconstruction of Contemporary Law as a System’, which examines methods to reduce fragmentation while achieving law’s unity. After an introduction of the monograph, I critically examine Ondřejek’s claim that the proportionality test used in constitutional law enhances the unity of the legal system. While I agree with the claim, I find it too weak in its scope. Therefore, I present three arguments to support my thesis that the proportionality test, traditionally confined to constitutional law, should be extended to private law to address legal fragmentation more effectively. This extension would enhance the coherence and consistency of private law, reaching the broader goals of normative coherentism as presented in Ondřejek’s monograph.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Defragmentation of (Private) Law Through the Proportionality Test. A Review Essay on Ondřejek’s Monograph ‘Defragmentation of Law: Reconstruction of Contemporary Law as a System’

Popis výsledku anglicky

National legal systems are facing fragmentation, a process that significantly challenges the legal certainty and coherence of law. In this context, my essay reviews Pavel Ondřejek&apos;s new book ‘Defragmentation of Law: Reconstruction of Contemporary Law as a System’, which examines methods to reduce fragmentation while achieving law’s unity. After an introduction of the monograph, I critically examine Ondřejek’s claim that the proportionality test used in constitutional law enhances the unity of the legal system. While I agree with the claim, I find it too weak in its scope. Therefore, I present three arguments to support my thesis that the proportionality test, traditionally confined to constitutional law, should be extended to private law to address legal fragmentation more effectively. This extension would enhance the coherence and consistency of private law, reaching the broader goals of normative coherentism as presented in Ondřejek’s monograph.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Ratio Publica

ISSN

2787-9550

e-ISSN

2787-9569

Svazek periodika

4

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

4-17

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85201391626