Smart Administrative Punishment: a Slippery Slope of Automated Decision-Making and its Economic Incentives in Public Law
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F25%3A10499572" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/25:10499572 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=8mlzwOLJl4" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=8mlzwOLJl4</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13130/2723-9195/2025-2-61" target="_blank" >10.13130/2723-9195/2025-2-61</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Smart Administrative Punishment: a Slippery Slope of Automated Decision-Making and its Economic Incentives in Public Law
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The increasing automation of administrative punishment within smart cities marks a transformative shift in public law enforcement. While automated decision-making enhances efficiency and consistency, it raises critical concerns about its true incentives and adherence to the principles of administrative punishment. This article explores the mechanisms and legislative frameworks enabling smart administrative punishment, focusing on traffic enforcement and the fiscal incentives that shape policy. It critically examines the risks of revenue-driven enforcement, erosion of legal safeguards, and distortion of administrative priorities. By analyzing cases such as the objectivization of vehicle owner liability in the Czech Republic, the article shows how poorly regulated automation may compromise legal principles like proportionality, due process, and deterrence. It argues that while efficiency is a legitimate goal, economic rationality should not overshadow justice, calling for a balanced approach that integrates automation with safeguards against misuse.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Smart Administrative Punishment: a Slippery Slope of Automated Decision-Making and its Economic Incentives in Public Law
Popis výsledku anglicky
The increasing automation of administrative punishment within smart cities marks a transformative shift in public law enforcement. While automated decision-making enhances efficiency and consistency, it raises critical concerns about its true incentives and adherence to the principles of administrative punishment. This article explores the mechanisms and legislative frameworks enabling smart administrative punishment, focusing on traffic enforcement and the fiscal incentives that shape policy. It critically examines the risks of revenue-driven enforcement, erosion of legal safeguards, and distortion of administrative priorities. By analyzing cases such as the objectivization of vehicle owner liability in the Czech Republic, the article shows how poorly regulated automation may compromise legal principles like proportionality, due process, and deterrence. It argues that while efficiency is a legitimate goal, economic rationality should not overshadow justice, calling for a balanced approach that integrates automation with safeguards against misuse.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Ceridap
ISSN
2723-9195
e-ISSN
2723-9195
Svazek periodika
2025
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
IT - Italská republika
Počet stran výsledku
23
Strana od-do
156-178
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105015166185