Artificial intelligence in the judiciary: A threat to the right to a fair trial?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F25%3A10514054" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/25:10514054 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Artificial intelligence in the judiciary: A threat to the right to a fair trial?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

We live in an era of artificial intelligence development, in which there is no longer any debate about whether judges&apos; decisions will be replaced by artificial intelligence, but rather only about when and to what extent. It is precisely at this time that there is a growing need to draw attention to the constitutional limits of implementing AI in decision-making processes.Artificial intelligence already has its place in decision-making processes. Countries are increasingly introducing AI algorithms for decision-making in the judiciary. The growing importance of AI is evidenced, for example, by the fact that a judge consulted artificial intelligence instead of his own judgment when assessing criminality. This, of course, brings advantages, particularly speed and efficiency, but also risks, including possible systemic errors and a lack of the human element. This paper will focus on the consequences of deploying algorithmic systems in court decision-making in the context of the right to a fair trial. I will address the question of whether and how AI interferes with the right to a fair trial. The aim of the paper is to assess the extent to which the use of AI tools in the judiciary is compatible with the fundamental right to a fair trial.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Artificial intelligence in the judiciary: A threat to the right to a fair trial?

Popis výsledku anglicky

We live in an era of artificial intelligence development, in which there is no longer any debate about whether judges&apos; decisions will be replaced by artificial intelligence, but rather only about when and to what extent. It is precisely at this time that there is a growing need to draw attention to the constitutional limits of implementing AI in decision-making processes.Artificial intelligence already has its place in decision-making processes. Countries are increasingly introducing AI algorithms for decision-making in the judiciary. The growing importance of AI is evidenced, for example, by the fact that a judge consulted artificial intelligence instead of his own judgment when assessing criminality. This, of course, brings advantages, particularly speed and efficiency, but also risks, including possible systemic errors and a lack of the human element. This paper will focus on the consequences of deploying algorithmic systems in court decision-making in the context of the right to a fair trial. I will address the question of whether and how AI interferes with the right to a fair trial. The aim of the paper is to assess the extent to which the use of AI tools in the judiciary is compatible with the fundamental right to a fair trial.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Ústavní právo a technologie

ISBN

978-80-7502-850-1

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

27-36

Název nakladatele

Nakladatelství Leges, s.r.o.

Místo vydání

Praha

Místo konání akce

Jindřichův Hradec

Datum konání akce

28. 7. 2025

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

CST - Celostátní akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—