A conceptual framework for comparison of educational policies

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F12%3A10126058" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/12:10126058 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://eng.kedi.re.kr/khome/eng/kjep/pubList.do" target="_blank" >http://eng.kedi.re.kr/khome/eng/kjep/pubList.do</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A conceptual framework for comparison of educational policies

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article deals with the formulation of a conceptual framework for comparing educational policies and assessing their impact upon educational outcomes. The conceptual framework includes six basic components: (1) educational policy-making, (2) educational policy-making inputs, (3) processes, (4) outcomes, (5) effects and (6) context. The framework focuses upon educational policy-making inputs, i.e. actions at the disposal of the government for influencing educational processes. Three general types ofpossible government actions are distinguished: (a) formulation of goals and problems, (b) policy instruments, (c) institutional setting. A general overview of the whole framework is provided before three types of educational policy-making inputs are discussed and classified in more detail. The article concludes with identifying potential uses and limitations of the framework.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A conceptual framework for comparison of educational policies

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article deals with the formulation of a conceptual framework for comparing educational policies and assessing their impact upon educational outcomes. The conceptual framework includes six basic components: (1) educational policy-making, (2) educational policy-making inputs, (3) processes, (4) outcomes, (5) effects and (6) context. The framework focuses upon educational policy-making inputs, i.e. actions at the disposal of the government for influencing educational processes. Three general types ofpossible government actions are distinguished: (a) formulation of goals and problems, (b) policy instruments, (c) institutional setting. A general overview of the whole framework is provided before three types of educational policy-making inputs are discussed and classified in more detail. The article concludes with identifying potential uses and limitations of the framework.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

KEDI Journal of Educational Policy

ISSN

1739-4341

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

9

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

KR - Korejská republika

Počet stran výsledku

25

Strana od-do

323-347

Kód UT WoS článku

000313220100007

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—