On Walls, Squares, Bridges and Sqridges : a framework to think about North-South dialogues in communication and media studies

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F14%3A10285251" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/14:10285251 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.alaic.net/journal/index.php/jlacr/article/view/88" target="_blank" >http://www.alaic.net/journal/index.php/jlacr/article/view/88</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

On Walls, Squares, Bridges and Sqridges : a framework to think about North-South dialogues in communication and media studies

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article analyses the workings of antagonism in academia, within a series of dimensions, such as political conflict, paradigmatic conflict (triggered by particular academic ontologies, epistemiologies, axiologies and methodologies), linguistic conflict and organizational conflict (triggered by competitive cultures and market-driven logics). After a discussion of different antagonisms, grounded in the European (academic) experiences of the author, the article then turns its attention to two trajectories that have the potential to overcome these divides: the fantasy of homogeneity and the recognition that conflict can be transformed from antagonism to agonism. The problem with the first trajectory lies in the post-political ignorance of conflict anddiversity, which contradicts the need to structurally acknowledge the existence of conflict at the ontological level. For this reason, the second trajectory is preferred and used to support an analysis of the thresholds that hinder dialog

Název v anglickém jazyce

On Walls, Squares, Bridges and Sqridges : a framework to think about North-South dialogues in communication and media studies

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article analyses the workings of antagonism in academia, within a series of dimensions, such as political conflict, paradigmatic conflict (triggered by particular academic ontologies, epistemiologies, axiologies and methodologies), linguistic conflict and organizational conflict (triggered by competitive cultures and market-driven logics). After a discussion of different antagonisms, grounded in the European (academic) experiences of the author, the article then turns its attention to two trajectories that have the potential to overcome these divides: the fantasy of homogeneity and the recognition that conflict can be transformed from antagonism to agonism. The problem with the first trajectory lies in the post-political ignorance of conflict anddiversity, which contradicts the need to structurally acknowledge the existence of conflict at the ontological level. For this reason, the second trajectory is preferred and used to support an analysis of the thresholds that hinder dialog

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AJ - Písemnictví, mas–media, audiovize

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Latin American Communication Research

ISSN

2237-1265

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

4

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

PR - Portoriko

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

12-29

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—