Systemic Corruption in Public Procurement (Two Cases from the Czech Republic)
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F15%3A10314483" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/15:10314483 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Systemic Corruption in Public Procurement (Two Cases from the Czech Republic)
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This study deals with the systemic corruption in public procurement. Systemic corruption is of institutional nature and represents corruptive behavior of a group. It involves the entire public procurement process, which is being rigged, and it is not the result of individual misconduct. The outcome of public procurement is usually agreed on beforehand and before the public procurement is publicly advertised. In this research study the authors present two cases of systemic corruption which took place in the local and the state administrations in the Czech Republic. The qualitative analysis sheds light on actors of systemic corruption and their ties. A qualitative descriptive model has been proposed to show official phases of public procurement - T1 (pre-bidding), T2 (bidding), T3 (post-bidding). Moreover, two additional phases have been identified as: T0 in which the corrupt actors enter the process (before the advertisement of the public tender) and the T4 phase during which the corrupting parties work out their mutual obligations among each other which were stipulated in the collusive agreements made in the T0 phase.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Systemic Corruption in Public Procurement (Two Cases from the Czech Republic)
Popis výsledku anglicky
This study deals with the systemic corruption in public procurement. Systemic corruption is of institutional nature and represents corruptive behavior of a group. It involves the entire public procurement process, which is being rigged, and it is not the result of individual misconduct. The outcome of public procurement is usually agreed on beforehand and before the public procurement is publicly advertised. In this research study the authors present two cases of systemic corruption which took place in the local and the state administrations in the Czech Republic. The qualitative analysis sheds light on actors of systemic corruption and their ties. A qualitative descriptive model has been proposed to show official phases of public procurement - T1 (pre-bidding), T2 (bidding), T3 (post-bidding). Moreover, two additional phases have been identified as: T0 in which the corrupt actors enter the process (before the advertisement of the public tender) and the T4 phase during which the corrupting parties work out their mutual obligations among each other which were stipulated in the collusive agreements made in the T0 phase.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50602 - Public administration
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Public economics and administration 2015 : proceedings of the 11th international scientific conference
ISBN
978-80-248-3839-7
ISSN
1805-9104
e-ISSN
neuvedeno
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
112-117
Název nakladatele
Technical University of Ostrava. Faculty of Economics
Místo vydání
Ostrava
Místo konání akce
Ostrava
Datum konání akce
8. 9. 2015
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
EUR - Evropská akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000377394000018