National Varieties of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): A Comparative Analysis of PPP-Supporting Units in 19 European Countries

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F16%3A10312031" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/16:10312031 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13876988.2015.1006814" target="_blank" >http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13876988.2015.1006814</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2015.1006814" target="_blank" >10.1080/13876988.2015.1006814</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

National Varieties of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): A Comparative Analysis of PPP-Supporting Units in 19 European Countries

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Most countries that have adopted the public-private partnership (PPP) model as a means of implementing infrastructure projects have launched dedicated supporting units to guide policy development and stimulate project implementation. This paper draws on the theoretical notion of PPP-enabling fields to carry out a comparative analysis of the roles and functions of PPP-supporting units across 19 European countries with varying PPP experiences. We distinguish four categories of national support of PPPs, from skeptical systems of zero support to full-fledged PPP systems. Furthermore, we take initial steps to analyze the possible link between national differences in institutionalized PPP support and the amount of implemented PPP projects. Finally, pathways for further research on PPP-supporting units are discussed.

Název v anglickém jazyce

National Varieties of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): A Comparative Analysis of PPP-Supporting Units in 19 European Countries

Popis výsledku anglicky

Most countries that have adopted the public-private partnership (PPP) model as a means of implementing infrastructure projects have launched dedicated supporting units to guide policy development and stimulate project implementation. This paper draws on the theoretical notion of PPP-enabling fields to carry out a comparative analysis of the roles and functions of PPP-supporting units across 19 European countries with varying PPP experiences. We distinguish four categories of national support of PPPs, from skeptical systems of zero support to full-fledged PPP systems. Furthermore, we take initial steps to analyze the possible link between national differences in institutionalized PPP support and the amount of implemented PPP projects. Finally, pathways for further research on PPP-supporting units are discussed.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice

ISSN

1387-6988

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

18

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

1-20

Kód UT WoS článku

000372119900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84961211463