Contradictory Approaches: Discussing Semi-Presidentialism in Central Europe

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F16%3A10325059" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/16:10325059 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://anale.fspub.unibuc.ro/" target="_blank" >http://anale.fspub.unibuc.ro/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Contradictory Approaches: Discussing Semi-Presidentialism in Central Europe

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Attentive students of Central European political regimes may come across a striking phenomenon: political scientists of the region differ sharply from most of English-writing researchers on how they understand Central European political regimes. Whereas the latter group of political analysts usually refers to these regimes as semi-presidential, their counterparts in Central Europegenerally claim that these regimes are parliamentary. Our article is an analysis of the two contradicting approaches on the nature of democratic regimes in Central Europe. This examination is carried out in the context of the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia. Major changes in the position of president took place in these countries. This is why the question of the nature of their political regimes is a frequent subject of both discussions and analyses. This difference is explained by different theoretical as well as methodological approaches.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Contradictory Approaches: Discussing Semi-Presidentialism in Central Europe

Popis výsledku anglicky

Attentive students of Central European political regimes may come across a striking phenomenon: political scientists of the region differ sharply from most of English-writing researchers on how they understand Central European political regimes. Whereas the latter group of political analysts usually refers to these regimes as semi-presidential, their counterparts in Central Europegenerally claim that these regimes are parliamentary. Our article is an analysis of the two contradicting approaches on the nature of democratic regimes in Central Europe. This examination is carried out in the context of the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia. Major changes in the position of president took place in these countries. This is why the question of the nature of their political regimes is a frequent subject of both discussions and analyses. This difference is explained by different theoretical as well as methodological approaches.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA15-01907S" target="_blank" >GA15-01907S: Hraje přímá volba roli? Analýza účinků přímé volby prezidenta na fungování politického režimu České republiky</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Analele Universitati Bucuresti. Seria Ştiinte Politice

ISSN

1582-2486

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

18

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

RO - Rumunsko

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

67-79

Kód UT WoS článku

000383907800003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84994259840