Voting in Central Banks: Theory versus Stylized Facts
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F16%3A10338404" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/16:10338404 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11640/16:00471409
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2015-0227" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2015-0227</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2015-0227" target="_blank" >10.1515/bejeap-2015-0227</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Voting in Central Banks: Theory versus Stylized Facts
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The paper examines the ability of several alternative group decision-making models to generate proposing, voting and decision patterns matching those observed in the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee and the US Federal Reserve's Federal Open Market Committee. A decision-making procedure, common to all the models, is to vote between adoption of the chairman's proposal and retention of the status-quo policy, with heterogeneous votes generated by private information of the models' monetary policy committee members. The members can additionally express reservations regarding the final committee decision. The three alternative models differ in the degree of informational influence between the chairman and the remaining members. We find that a "super-majoritarian" model, in which the chairman proposes a policy she knows would be accepted by a supermajority of the committee members, combined with allowance for reservations, closely replicates real-world decision-making patterns. The model predicts no rejections of chairman's proposals, low but non-trivial dissent, even during meetings where the chairman proposes no change in policy, and predictive power of the voting record of the whole committee regarding future monetary policy changes.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Voting in Central Banks: Theory versus Stylized Facts
Popis výsledku anglicky
The paper examines the ability of several alternative group decision-making models to generate proposing, voting and decision patterns matching those observed in the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee and the US Federal Reserve's Federal Open Market Committee. A decision-making procedure, common to all the models, is to vote between adoption of the chairman's proposal and retention of the status-quo policy, with heterogeneous votes generated by private information of the models' monetary policy committee members. The members can additionally express reservations regarding the final committee decision. The three alternative models differ in the degree of informational influence between the chairman and the remaining members. We find that a "super-majoritarian" model, in which the chairman proposes a policy she knows would be accepted by a supermajority of the committee members, combined with allowance for reservations, closely replicates real-world decision-making patterns. The model predicts no rejections of chairman's proposals, low but non-trivial dissent, even during meetings where the chairman proposes no change in policy, and predictive power of the voting record of the whole committee regarding future monetary policy changes.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AH - Ekonomie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GBP402%2F12%2FG097" target="_blank" >GBP402/12/G097: DYME-Dynamické modely v ekonomii</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy
ISSN
1935-1682
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
16
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
62
Strana od-do
—
Kód UT WoS článku
000395809400001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85012865688