Meta-Analysis of Chinese Business Cycle Correlation

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F18%3A10326440" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/18:10326440 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12173" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12173</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12173" target="_blank" >10.1111/1468-0106.12173</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Meta-Analysis of Chinese Business Cycle Correlation

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

We review previous research on China&apos;s business cycle correlation with other economies applying meta-analysis. We survey 71 papers analysing the different periods of Chinese economic development since the 1950s that were published in English or Chinese. We confirm that Pacific Rim economies in particular have relatively high business cycle correlation with China. It appears that many characteristics of the studies and authors influence the reported degree of business cycle synchronization. For instance, Chinese-language papers report higher correlation coefficients. Despite this, we do not detect robust evidence for publication bias in the papers. Moreover, we show that the broad evidence does not confirm the popular decoupling hypothesis.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Meta-Analysis of Chinese Business Cycle Correlation

Popis výsledku anglicky

We review previous research on China&apos;s business cycle correlation with other economies applying meta-analysis. We survey 71 papers analysing the different periods of Chinese economic development since the 1950s that were published in English or Chinese. We confirm that Pacific Rim economies in particular have relatively high business cycle correlation with China. It appears that many characteristics of the studies and authors influence the reported degree of business cycle synchronization. For instance, Chinese-language papers report higher correlation coefficients. Despite this, we do not detect robust evidence for publication bias in the papers. Moreover, we show that the broad evidence does not confirm the popular decoupling hypothesis.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50201 - Economic Theory

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Pacific Economic Review

ISSN

1361-374X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

23

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CN - Čínská lidová republika

Počet stran výsledku

26

Strana od-do

385-410

Kód UT WoS článku

000440658900002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84988038854