Resilience through Words?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F18%3A10367293" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/18:10367293 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2017.1377865" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2017.1377865</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2017.1377865" target="_blank" >10.1080/21693293.2017.1377865</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Resilience through Words?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

During crises, institutions often seek to legitimize their policy interventions by providing a new definition of the current situation in which their intervention is presented as the appropriate solution to actual problems. This new definition, however, could have adverse symbolic and normative consequences for some groups in the society, e.g. by lowering their social status or challenging group norms and values. The group&apos;s ability to generate an alternative definition of a situation and thus to cope rhetorically with adverse symbolic conditions will be described herein as &apos;discursive resilience&apos;. It will be argued that the concept of discursive resilience makes it possible to better understand the more complex critical potential of the broader concept of social resilience. The phenomenon of discursive resilience will be evidenced empirically by means of a meta-analysis of Gerlinde Mautner&apos;s conception of the discourse of marketisation and the author&apos;s own study of the public controversy that emerged after the Czech National Bank launched a foreign exchange intervention in November 2013. It will be shown that discursive resilience occurred mainly in the blogosphere and took the form of translating expert discourse into lay terminology in order to make the intervention understandable to and amenable to criticism by the wider public.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Resilience through Words?

Popis výsledku anglicky

During crises, institutions often seek to legitimize their policy interventions by providing a new definition of the current situation in which their intervention is presented as the appropriate solution to actual problems. This new definition, however, could have adverse symbolic and normative consequences for some groups in the society, e.g. by lowering their social status or challenging group norms and values. The group&apos;s ability to generate an alternative definition of a situation and thus to cope rhetorically with adverse symbolic conditions will be described herein as &apos;discursive resilience&apos;. It will be argued that the concept of discursive resilience makes it possible to better understand the more complex critical potential of the broader concept of social resilience. The phenomenon of discursive resilience will be evidenced empirically by means of a meta-analysis of Gerlinde Mautner&apos;s conception of the discourse of marketisation and the author&apos;s own study of the public controversy that emerged after the Czech National Bank launched a foreign exchange intervention in November 2013. It will be shown that discursive resilience occurred mainly in the blogosphere and took the form of translating expert discourse into lay terminology in order to make the intervention understandable to and amenable to criticism by the wider public.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50401 - Sociology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA15-04863S" target="_blank" >GA15-04863S: Šetrnost a hospodárnost v časech krize: ekonomické chování v rodinném a veřejném diskurzu v dnešní české společnosti</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses

ISSN

2169-3293

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

6

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

95-111

Kód UT WoS článku

000445770000002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—