Not lost in contestation: How norm entrepreneurs frame norm development in the nuclear nonproliferation regime

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F18%3A10373226" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/18:10373226 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2017.1394032" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2017.1394032</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2017.1394032" target="_blank" >10.1080/13523260.2017.1394032</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Not lost in contestation: How norm entrepreneurs frame norm development in the nuclear nonproliferation regime

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

With near universal membership, the nuclear nonproliferation regime can be considered a success of global nuclear governance. While it has proven robust since the Nonproliferation Treaty entered into force in 1970, the regime has faced continuous contestation, precisely because it is a delicate compromise between the nuclear and non-nuclear weapon states. In this article, we analyze the patterns of contestation within the regime as well as the actors driving these contestation processes. Our purpose is to assess how contestation has affected the development of nuclear norms. We show that contestation can lead to normative progress, result in blockage, or even lead to decay. We argue that the outcome depends on three factors: commitment by the powerful parties to appreciate the positions of the non-nuclear weapon states, the engagement of bridge-builders to shape compromises, and the construction of reciprocal gains for and compliance by all parties.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Not lost in contestation: How norm entrepreneurs frame norm development in the nuclear nonproliferation regime

Popis výsledku anglicky

With near universal membership, the nuclear nonproliferation regime can be considered a success of global nuclear governance. While it has proven robust since the Nonproliferation Treaty entered into force in 1970, the regime has faced continuous contestation, precisely because it is a delicate compromise between the nuclear and non-nuclear weapon states. In this article, we analyze the patterns of contestation within the regime as well as the actors driving these contestation processes. Our purpose is to assess how contestation has affected the development of nuclear norms. We show that contestation can lead to normative progress, result in blockage, or even lead to decay. We argue that the outcome depends on three factors: commitment by the powerful parties to appreciate the positions of the non-nuclear weapon states, the engagement of bridge-builders to shape compromises, and the construction of reciprocal gains for and compliance by all parties.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Contemporary Security Policy

ISSN

1352-3260

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

39

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

26

Strana od-do

341-366

Kód UT WoS článku

000442666300002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85041119461