The Contestation of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Regime

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F19%3A10411652" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/19:10411652 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198843047.003.0006" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198843047.003.0006</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198843047.003.0006" target="_blank" >10.1093/oso/9780198843047.003.0006</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Contestation of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Regime

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The nuclear world order, and more specifically the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), represent since their very creation objects of contestation. This chapter argues that it is the institutionalized power inequality between state parties that creates conflict among them over the distribution of security, economic, and developmental benefits. In that respect, states with growing economic importance and heightened security interests are most likely to contest the status quo, but not necessarily the BRICS states as these are not bound by a common interest or agenda within the regime. To analyse the contestation of the NPT, the chapter adopts a mixed method approach. Through a qualitative content analysis of states&apos; statements at major institutional gatherings, the chapter identifies four central conflict lines and actors&apos; preferences regarding the nuclear non-proliferation regime. Linear regression analysis is used to assess the relative influence of different actors groups on the intensity and type of contestation. Results show that the majority of state parties actively and constructively engages with the institution by pushing for institutional reform, recognizing in principle the legitimacy of the institution. Voicing criticism and exposing weaknesses of the institution was the least frequent form of contestation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Contestation of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Regime

Popis výsledku anglicky

The nuclear world order, and more specifically the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), represent since their very creation objects of contestation. This chapter argues that it is the institutionalized power inequality between state parties that creates conflict among them over the distribution of security, economic, and developmental benefits. In that respect, states with growing economic importance and heightened security interests are most likely to contest the status quo, but not necessarily the BRICS states as these are not bound by a common interest or agenda within the regime. To analyse the contestation of the NPT, the chapter adopts a mixed method approach. Through a qualitative content analysis of states&apos; statements at major institutional gatherings, the chapter identifies four central conflict lines and actors&apos; preferences regarding the nuclear non-proliferation regime. Linear regression analysis is used to assess the relative influence of different actors groups on the intensity and type of contestation. Results show that the majority of state parties actively and constructively engages with the institution by pushing for institutional reform, recognizing in principle the legitimacy of the institution. Voicing criticism and exposing weaknesses of the institution was the least frequent form of contestation.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Contested World Orders : Rising Powers, Non-Governmental Organizations, and the Politics of Authority Beyond the Nation-State

ISBN

978-0-19-884304-7

Počet stran výsledku

42

Strana od-do

202-243

Počet stran knihy

393

Název nakladatele

Oxford University Press

Místo vydání

Oxford

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—