Identifying Corruption Risk: A Comparison of Bulgaria and the Czech Republic
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F19%3A10379458" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/19:10379458 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=s_JV5OafJX" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=s_JV5OafJX</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2018.1472473" target="_blank" >10.1080/13876988.2018.1472473</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Identifying Corruption Risk: A Comparison of Bulgaria and the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The article focuses on risk assessment of individual and systematic corruption at the municipal level in the Czech Republic and Bulgaria. For this purpose, it uses the method of Corruption Risk FMEA, which is based on the classic Fault Mode and Effect Analysis used mainly in production. The model views corruption as an individual action, the application of which revealed significant differences in corruption risk which were detrimental in Bulgaria. The causes of these differences can be seen in the normative attitude of the public towards corruption, the insufficient involvement of the general public, and also the lack in range of controls. Improving the current situation can be achieved in two ways. The "low road" means increasing controls, for example, audits (in particular) and performance benchmarking, and applying them at the appropriate time. The "high road" means utilizing soft instruments and a change in the normative approach of the public towards corruption.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Identifying Corruption Risk: A Comparison of Bulgaria and the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku anglicky
The article focuses on risk assessment of individual and systematic corruption at the municipal level in the Czech Republic and Bulgaria. For this purpose, it uses the method of Corruption Risk FMEA, which is based on the classic Fault Mode and Effect Analysis used mainly in production. The model views corruption as an individual action, the application of which revealed significant differences in corruption risk which were detrimental in Bulgaria. The causes of these differences can be seen in the normative attitude of the public towards corruption, the insufficient involvement of the general public, and also the lack in range of controls. Improving the current situation can be achieved in two ways. The "low road" means increasing controls, for example, audits (in particular) and performance benchmarking, and applying them at the appropriate time. The "high road" means utilizing soft instruments and a change in the normative approach of the public towards corruption.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50602 - Public administration
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice
ISSN
1387-6988
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
21
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
19
Strana od-do
366-384
Kód UT WoS článku
000475650200004
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85068835407