Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Euromaidan and the 1989 Legacy: Solidarity in Action?

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F19%3A10400533" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/19:10400533 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Euromaidan and the 1989 Legacy: Solidarity in Action?

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The paper considers the EuroMaidan in 2013/14 as a misinterpreted revolution misjudged by the triggered consequences. Using the theoretical framework of a &apos;non-violent protest&apos; of the &apos;powerless&apos; as suggested by Jonathan Schell, I explicate the Ukrainian uprising as a short-time affirmation of popular power that embodies a peculiar type of democracy, namely &apos;civil democracy&apos; or &apos;radical democracy&apos;. It is stressed that upon the historical closure of the event, the policy-makers worldwide framed it according to their agenda thus depriving the people of their political agency and the event itself of its authenticity. Herewith the protesters lose not only any leverage in their country&apos;s governance, but also the monopoly for interpreting the events they enabled and engendered. Some legacy of the 1989 can be traced here in a twofold manner. The velvet revolutions in East-Central Europe also stood as declarations of &apos;radical democracy&apos;, which was commonly disregarded as well. The main trope for assessing the meaning of the 1989 has been the &apos;end of history&apos; claim by Francis Fukuyama, treating the former as a sign of the ultimate victory of the US and of the liberal democracy model. The paper aims to prove that the model of &apos;civil democracy&apos;, as it emerged in 1980s in East-Central Europe, presupposes a bigger role of civil society (the power of people) while restraining the state and the market rationality. It has important implications both for the democratic practice and the democratic imaginary nowadays.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Euromaidan and the 1989 Legacy: Solidarity in Action?

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The paper considers the EuroMaidan in 2013/14 as a misinterpreted revolution misjudged by the triggered consequences. Using the theoretical framework of a &apos;non-violent protest&apos; of the &apos;powerless&apos; as suggested by Jonathan Schell, I explicate the Ukrainian uprising as a short-time affirmation of popular power that embodies a peculiar type of democracy, namely &apos;civil democracy&apos; or &apos;radical democracy&apos;. It is stressed that upon the historical closure of the event, the policy-makers worldwide framed it according to their agenda thus depriving the people of their political agency and the event itself of its authenticity. Herewith the protesters lose not only any leverage in their country&apos;s governance, but also the monopoly for interpreting the events they enabled and engendered. Some legacy of the 1989 can be traced here in a twofold manner. The velvet revolutions in East-Central Europe also stood as declarations of &apos;radical democracy&apos;, which was commonly disregarded as well. The main trope for assessing the meaning of the 1989 has been the &apos;end of history&apos; claim by Francis Fukuyama, treating the former as a sign of the ultimate victory of the US and of the liberal democracy model. The paper aims to prove that the model of &apos;civil democracy&apos;, as it emerged in 1980s in East-Central Europe, presupposes a bigger role of civil society (the power of people) while restraining the state and the market rationality. It has important implications both for the democratic practice and the democratic imaginary nowadays.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    C - Kapitola v odborné knize

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2019

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název knihy nebo sborníku

    The Long 1989 : Decades of Global Revolution

  • ISBN

    978-963-386-283-4

  • Počet stran výsledku

    21

  • Strana od-do

    231-251

  • Počet stran knihy

    284

  • Název nakladatele

    Central European University Press

  • Místo vydání

    Budapest

  • Kód UT WoS kapitoly