How moral foundations shape public approval of nuclear, chemical, and conventional strikes: new evidence from experimental surveys
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F21%3A10419272" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/21:10419272 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=jlx3OeXoeG" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=jlx3OeXoeG</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2020.1848825" target="_blank" >10.1080/03050629.2020.1848825</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
How moral foundations shape public approval of nuclear, chemical, and conventional strikes: new evidence from experimental surveys
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In this article, we present the results of two survey experiments on public support for nuclear, chemical, and conventional strikes. We examined how moral values of individuals interact with the approval of different kinds of strikes and with the effects of information about the ingroup and out-group fatalities. Our results show that while the public is more averse to the employment of chemical weapons than to the conduct of nuclear or conventional strikes, the overall relationship between strike approval and the individuals' moral values does not differ across the three experimental treatments. In addition, we found that individuals' scores in so-called "binding" moral values affect the sensitivity of the public for in-group fatalities. Findings of our paper contribute to the broader debates in the field about the strength and nature of the norms against the use of nuclear and chemical weapons, and about the role of morality in the public attitudes to the use of military force.
Název v anglickém jazyce
How moral foundations shape public approval of nuclear, chemical, and conventional strikes: new evidence from experimental surveys
Popis výsledku anglicky
In this article, we present the results of two survey experiments on public support for nuclear, chemical, and conventional strikes. We examined how moral values of individuals interact with the approval of different kinds of strikes and with the effects of information about the ingroup and out-group fatalities. Our results show that while the public is more averse to the employment of chemical weapons than to the conduct of nuclear or conventional strikes, the overall relationship between strike approval and the individuals' moral values does not differ across the three experimental treatments. In addition, we found that individuals' scores in so-called "binding" moral values affect the sensitivity of the public for in-group fatalities. Findings of our paper contribute to the broader debates in the field about the strength and nature of the norms against the use of nuclear and chemical weapons, and about the role of morality in the public attitudes to the use of military force.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
International Interactions
ISSN
0305-0629
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
47
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
17
Strana od-do
374-390
Kód UT WoS článku
000600718000001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85097909677