Storifying routines and routinising stories: A dualistic subject positioning analysis of controversies about constraints on patient autonomy

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F21%3A10425601" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/21:10425601 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=5ixvOMZ.J2" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=5ixvOMZ.J2</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12267" target="_blank" >10.1111/jtsb.12267</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Storifying routines and routinising stories: A dualistic subject positioning analysis of controversies about constraints on patient autonomy

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper uses subject positioning theory to explore how conflicts between autonomy and protection are managed in the justification of controversial care arrangements for patients with mental/neurological illness. Its basic argument is twofold: firstly, to justify or propose care arrangements at strategic or contentious moments, actors position illness as an actant and make it present in talk-in-interaction, exploiting alignments and misalignments between the there and then of reported events and the above and beyond of shared societal discourses to say what matters and what&apos;s to be done here and now; secondly, the introduction of authoritative voices from elsewhere involves imbricating narrative and routine sequences in order to prioritise different subjectivities. Dilemmas opposing autonomy and protection may seem less intractable if we adopt a corresponding perspective interplay between narrative and routine situational readings

Název v anglickém jazyce

Storifying routines and routinising stories: A dualistic subject positioning analysis of controversies about constraints on patient autonomy

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper uses subject positioning theory to explore how conflicts between autonomy and protection are managed in the justification of controversial care arrangements for patients with mental/neurological illness. Its basic argument is twofold: firstly, to justify or propose care arrangements at strategic or contentious moments, actors position illness as an actant and make it present in talk-in-interaction, exploiting alignments and misalignments between the there and then of reported events and the above and beyond of shared societal discourses to say what matters and what&apos;s to be done here and now; secondly, the introduction of authoritative voices from elsewhere involves imbricating narrative and routine sequences in order to prioritise different subjectivities. Dilemmas opposing autonomy and protection may seem less intractable if we adopt a corresponding perspective interplay between narrative and routine situational readings

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50401 - Sociology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA17-01116S" target="_blank" >GA17-01116S: Občanská angažovanost a politika zdravotní péče</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour

ISSN

0021-8308

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

51

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

145-163

Kód UT WoS článku

000630181200008

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85102185909