On Tradition and Cultural Memory in Contemporary Art: Theoretical Considerations
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F21%3A10429694" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/21:10429694 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Jo23QXR77R" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Jo23QXR77R</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2021.0008" target="_blank" >10.14394/eidos.jpc.2021.0008</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
On Tradition and Cultural Memory in Contemporary Art: Theoretical Considerations
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper starts with a detailed analysis of Jan Assmann's qualitative distinction between cultural memory and communicative memory. The purpose of this analysis is to highlight both the strengths and the limitations of this seminal distinction, and to also reflect on what cultural theorists and contemporary artists could learn through Assmann's distinction since artistic production also employs cultural memory formats that do not exclude cultural traditions in their materializations. In line with these considerations, this paper aims to disentangle what "tradition" means to contemporary artists. Following Edward Shils and Hans-Georg Gadamer's philosophy of "tradition," the paper argues that cultural tradition does not necessarily have an oppressive character and the rebellion and suspicion against it is at the heart of tradition itself. Thus, the traditional/contemporary binary can be precluded by reconsidering how "tradition" and "traditional" are conceptualized considering philosophy of tradition and artistic memory.
Název v anglickém jazyce
On Tradition and Cultural Memory in Contemporary Art: Theoretical Considerations
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper starts with a detailed analysis of Jan Assmann's qualitative distinction between cultural memory and communicative memory. The purpose of this analysis is to highlight both the strengths and the limitations of this seminal distinction, and to also reflect on what cultural theorists and contemporary artists could learn through Assmann's distinction since artistic production also employs cultural memory formats that do not exclude cultural traditions in their materializations. In line with these considerations, this paper aims to disentangle what "tradition" means to contemporary artists. Following Edward Shils and Hans-Georg Gadamer's philosophy of "tradition," the paper argues that cultural tradition does not necessarily have an oppressive character and the rebellion and suspicion against it is at the heart of tradition itself. Thus, the traditional/contemporary binary can be precluded by reconsidering how "tradition" and "traditional" are conceptualized considering philosophy of tradition and artistic memory.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60401 - Arts, Art history
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture [online]
ISSN
2544-302X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
5
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
PL - Polská republika
Počet stran výsledku
14
Strana od-do
126-139
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85111287120