Parliaments in Pandemics: First Findings of an international comparative study

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F21%3A10439441" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/21:10439441 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=-fU3nDc4Su" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=-fU3nDc4Su</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0340-1758-2021-4-878" target="_blank" >10.5771/0340-1758-2021-4-878</a>

Jazyk výsledku

němčina

Název v původním jazyce

Parlamente in der Pandemie: Erste Erkenntnisse aus einem international vergleichenden Forschungsvorhaben

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

During the pandemic, parliaments around the globe suffered a &quot;double shock&quot;: they had to adjust to the challenges of the infectuous dissease and uphold or (re-)establish their roles with regards to the executive. A closer investigation of 27 parliaments in differetn political systems gives a first comparative account for their initial reaction to the crisis. It is based on infromation from an ongoing collaboration of experts on parliaments and builds on a model of historical institutionalism. In some countries, significant measures were taken, including restrictions in palriamentary proceedings and moving some of them online. Committees served as a field of experimentation for digitalizing parliaments. While only in a few countries, legislative activities were strongly dominated by the pendemic, in most countries continuity across policy areas prevailed. More variety can be seen in institutional changes for parliamentary oversight. Cimmunication activities intensified with the pandemic, particularly from parliamentary leadership. These first results indicate that parliaments and established parliamentary democracies, in particular, were able to perform their functions despite unprecedented challenges posed by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Parliaments in Pandemics: First Findings of an international comparative study

Popis výsledku anglicky

During the pandemic, parliaments around the globe suffered a &quot;double shock&quot;: they had to adjust to the challenges of the infectuous dissease and uphold or (re-)establish their roles with regards to the executive. A closer investigation of 27 parliaments in differetn political systems gives a first comparative account for their initial reaction to the crisis. It is based on infromation from an ongoing collaboration of experts on parliaments and builds on a model of historical institutionalism. In some countries, significant measures were taken, including restrictions in palriamentary proceedings and moving some of them online. Committees served as a field of experimentation for digitalizing parliaments. While only in a few countries, legislative activities were strongly dominated by the pendemic, in most countries continuity across policy areas prevailed. More variety can be seen in institutional changes for parliamentary oversight. Cimmunication activities intensified with the pandemic, particularly from parliamentary leadership. These first results indicate that parliaments and established parliamentary democracies, in particular, were able to perform their functions despite unprecedented challenges posed by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen

ISSN

0340-1758

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

52

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

878-895

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—