“I Am Not Racist, But …”: Rhetorical Fallacies in Arguments about the Refugee Crisis on Czech Facebook

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F21%3A10456298" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/21:10456298 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=GgefjJVR1" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=GgefjJVR1</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

“I Am Not Racist, But …”: Rhetorical Fallacies in Arguments about the Refugee Crisis on Czech Facebook

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper examines the strategies of social media users commenting on the so-called refugee crisis. This qualitative analysis of the role of passion politics discourse on social media primarily employs the concept of rhetorical fallacies. It aims to stress the interdiscursive nature of immigration as a topic. It is connected with anti-liberalism, anti-feminism (or homophobia), and conservatism. For the purpose of this study, we used techniques for social-media monitoring to analyze social-media conversations related to migration on the Facebook page of Parlamentnílisty.cz news during the Czech parliamentary and presidential elections. This analysis showed that rhetorical fallacies were used in a relatively small amount of the studied material. Only 13% of all comments contained rhetorical fallacies, among which the most used was the ad hominem fallacy (55% of the total), &quot;call for fear&quot; (11%) and &quot;false authority&quot; (7%). (C) 2021, Immigrant Institutet. All rights reserved.

Název v anglickém jazyce

“I Am Not Racist, But …”: Rhetorical Fallacies in Arguments about the Refugee Crisis on Czech Facebook

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper examines the strategies of social media users commenting on the so-called refugee crisis. This qualitative analysis of the role of passion politics discourse on social media primarily employs the concept of rhetorical fallacies. It aims to stress the interdiscursive nature of immigration as a topic. It is connected with anti-liberalism, anti-feminism (or homophobia), and conservatism. For the purpose of this study, we used techniques for social-media monitoring to analyze social-media conversations related to migration on the Facebook page of Parlamentnílisty.cz news during the Czech parliamentary and presidential elections. This analysis showed that rhetorical fallacies were used in a relatively small amount of the studied material. Only 13% of all comments contained rhetorical fallacies, among which the most used was the ad hominem fallacy (55% of the total), &quot;call for fear&quot; (11%) and &quot;false authority&quot; (7%). (C) 2021, Immigrant Institutet. All rights reserved.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50802 - Media and socio-cultural communication

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA17-17085S" target="_blank" >GA17-17085S: Vývoj a podoby občanské online participace v České republice ve vztahu k evropské migrační krizi</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Intercultural Communication

ISSN

1404-1634

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

21

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

SE - Švédské království

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

58-69

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85116960529