One hammer for all nails? Testing the autonomy of policy instrument attitudes

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F22%3A10447704" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/22:10447704 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=g72O.qbpN8" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=g72O.qbpN8</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1159" target="_blank" >10.1002/epa2.1159</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

One hammer for all nails? Testing the autonomy of policy instrument attitudes

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Policy design is influenced by stakeholders&apos; attitudes and contextual constraints. While the latter factor is highly variable, attitudes toward policy instruments are deemed more stable across both policy domains and time. This article uses evidence from a cross-sectional survey of Czech university students to examine the autonomy of policy instrument attitudes (APIA) in five policy domains. Only 16% of students endorse a small set of universal instruments for a wide range of applications (so-called instrumentalists) which indicates rather low cross-domain consistency of attitudes (strong APIA hypothesis). Attitudes toward information instruments are correlated within policy domains, thus providing some support for the weak version of APIA. However, this association does not apply to other instruments. The results suggest that the majority of students can be seen as contingentists whose evaluation of the merits of instruments is based on instruments&apos; suitability for a particular problem. (C) 2022 Policy Studies Organization.

Název v anglickém jazyce

One hammer for all nails? Testing the autonomy of policy instrument attitudes

Popis výsledku anglicky

Policy design is influenced by stakeholders&apos; attitudes and contextual constraints. While the latter factor is highly variable, attitudes toward policy instruments are deemed more stable across both policy domains and time. This article uses evidence from a cross-sectional survey of Czech university students to examine the autonomy of policy instrument attitudes (APIA) in five policy domains. Only 16% of students endorse a small set of universal instruments for a wide range of applications (so-called instrumentalists) which indicates rather low cross-domain consistency of attitudes (strong APIA hypothesis). Attitudes toward information instruments are correlated within policy domains, thus providing some support for the weak version of APIA. However, this association does not apply to other instruments. The results suggest that the majority of students can be seen as contingentists whose evaluation of the merits of instruments is based on instruments&apos; suitability for a particular problem. (C) 2022 Policy Studies Organization.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50602 - Public administration

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA19-02986S" target="_blank" >GA19-02986S: Individuální a kontextuální prediktory postojů k nástrojům veřejných politik</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Policy Analysis [online]

ISSN

2380-6567

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

8

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

394-415

Kód UT WoS článku

000841531300001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85135900880