Converging on Europe? The European Union in mediatised debates during the COVID-19 and Ukraine shocks
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F24%3A10480090" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/24:10480090 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=nI8tPOePey" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=nI8tPOePey</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2344849" target="_blank" >10.1080/13501763.2024.2344849</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Converging on Europe? The European Union in mediatised debates during the COVID-19 and Ukraine shocks
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
European integration is at risk of becoming stuck in a 'politics' trap: Diverging national EU politicisation inhibits joint agreements which fuels public debates further. What can break this vicious circle? We argue that large and symmetrical exogenous shocks may reduce the divergence of national public EU debates to then study how the COVID-19 and Ukraine crises have altered mediatised EU portrayals across 753,435 articles from 228 major online news sites in the 27 EU member states during the 2018-2023 period. We find that the Covid and especially the Ukraine shock led to higher convergence in the public salience of the EU and the issue areas associated with this while partially also muting domestic party presence. However, we note that these effects appear short-lived. Large exogenous shocks thus do not lift the politicisation constraints on European integration permanently but offer at least windows of opportunity that may facilitate intergovernmental compromise.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Converging on Europe? The European Union in mediatised debates during the COVID-19 and Ukraine shocks
Popis výsledku anglicky
European integration is at risk of becoming stuck in a 'politics' trap: Diverging national EU politicisation inhibits joint agreements which fuels public debates further. What can break this vicious circle? We argue that large and symmetrical exogenous shocks may reduce the divergence of national public EU debates to then study how the COVID-19 and Ukraine crises have altered mediatised EU portrayals across 753,435 articles from 228 major online news sites in the 27 EU member states during the 2018-2023 period. We find that the Covid and especially the Ukraine shock led to higher convergence in the public salience of the EU and the issue areas associated with this while partially also muting domestic party presence. However, we note that these effects appear short-lived. Large exogenous shocks thus do not lift the politicisation constraints on European integration permanently but offer at least windows of opportunity that may facilitate intergovernmental compromise.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of European Public Policy
ISSN
1350-1763
e-ISSN
1466-4429
Svazek periodika
31
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
10
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
30
Strana od-do
3036-3065
Kód UT WoS článku
001207961700001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85191042105