Allies and partners: US public opinion and relationships in the Indo-Pacific

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F25%3A10500218" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/25:10500218 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=gjRGcQ2Zxv" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=gjRGcQ2Zxv</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2025.2522708" target="_blank" >10.1080/13523260.2025.2522708</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Allies and partners: US public opinion and relationships in the Indo-Pacific

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Competition between China and the United States spurs renewed emphasis on security cooperation in the Indo-Pacific. However, this development in security collaboration unfolds differently from the past. While Washington&apos;s Cold War alliances endure, these are supplemented by less formal arrangements with new regional partners. This reflects a shift from the codified obligations of treaty alliances in favor of flexible forms of security partnerships. While the distinctions between allies and partners may blur during peacetime, they can become acute amid a crisis. To test how differences in security arrangements may manifest in a crisis, we conducted a survey experiment on a representative sample of 2,021 US citizens, exploring their response to Chinese aggression against a regional state. We find that variations in bilateral relationships influence public support for the target of China&apos;s aggression. However, an aversion to retaliatory measures towards China exists, regardless of the target&apos;s relationship with the United States.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Allies and partners: US public opinion and relationships in the Indo-Pacific

Popis výsledku anglicky

Competition between China and the United States spurs renewed emphasis on security cooperation in the Indo-Pacific. However, this development in security collaboration unfolds differently from the past. While Washington&apos;s Cold War alliances endure, these are supplemented by less formal arrangements with new regional partners. This reflects a shift from the codified obligations of treaty alliances in favor of flexible forms of security partnerships. While the distinctions between allies and partners may blur during peacetime, they can become acute amid a crisis. To test how differences in security arrangements may manifest in a crisis, we conducted a survey experiment on a representative sample of 2,021 US citizens, exploring their response to Chinese aggression against a regional state. We find that variations in bilateral relationships influence public support for the target of China&apos;s aggression. However, an aversion to retaliatory measures towards China exists, regardless of the target&apos;s relationship with the United States.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Contemporary Security Policy

ISSN

1352-3260

e-ISSN

1743-8764

Svazek periodika

46

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

31

Strana od-do

1110-1140

Kód UT WoS článku

001533745500001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105011353428