Democracy and State Support for Arms Control
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F25%3A10500220" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/25:10500220 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=fdnfa8xrDu" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=fdnfa8xrDu</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraf026" target="_blank" >10.1093/fpa/oraf026</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Democracy and State Support for Arms Control
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This article presents the first global quantitative study of the relationship between states' level of liberal democracy and their support for arms control. While I expect that democracy leads to more support for conventional arms control, I argue that democracies are only more supportive of nuclear arms control agreements that are designed by fellow democracies. For my analysis, I use a new measure of states' arms control preferences that combines United Nations General Assembly voting data with manual coding of resolutions. In line with my expectations, I find a positive relationship between democracy and support for conventional arms control, but not nuclear arms control. This is because democracies tend to support conventional arms control regardless of who co-sponsors a resolution, whereas they only tend to support nuclear arms control resolutions co-sponsored by democracies. These findings contribute to our understanding of arms control as well as international politics more generally.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Democracy and State Support for Arms Control
Popis výsledku anglicky
This article presents the first global quantitative study of the relationship between states' level of liberal democracy and their support for arms control. While I expect that democracy leads to more support for conventional arms control, I argue that democracies are only more supportive of nuclear arms control agreements that are designed by fellow democracies. For my analysis, I use a new measure of states' arms control preferences that combines United Nations General Assembly voting data with manual coding of resolutions. In line with my expectations, I find a positive relationship between democracy and support for conventional arms control, but not nuclear arms control. This is because democracies tend to support conventional arms control regardless of who co-sponsors a resolution, whereas they only tend to support nuclear arms control resolutions co-sponsored by democracies. These findings contribute to our understanding of arms control as well as international politics more generally.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Foreign Policy Analysis
ISSN
1743-8586
e-ISSN
1743-8594
Svazek periodika
21
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
22
Strana od-do
1-22
Kód UT WoS článku
001685364200001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105013277047