De-Subjectification in Semiotics: Argumentations, Self-Defense and Signs of Opposing Forces

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F16%3A10330412" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/16:10330412 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.pragmatismtoday.eu/winter2016/De-Subjectification-in-Semiotics-Argumentations-Self-Defense-and-Signs-of-Opposing-Forces-Martin-Svantner.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.pragmatismtoday.eu/winter2016/De-Subjectification-in-Semiotics-Argumentations-Self-Defense-and-Signs-of-Opposing-Forces-Martin-Svantner.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

De-Subjectification in Semiotics: Argumentations, Self-Defense and Signs of Opposing Forces

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In this reflection I would like to consider some effects of selected semiologic and semiotic perspectives on persuasion and subjectivity interconnected to general semiotics and theoretical rhetorics. I will argue that there are two possible ways how to "unravel the tangled skein" of some of these interconnections (between semiotic and rhetorical structure of the subject). We can find them inside two basic paradigms of semiotics: first (i) in semiology and (mostly Foucauldian) structuralism and the second (ii) in (mostly Peircean) semiotic. These two methodological viewpoints take as their point of departure general relation which is sign, but in completely different manner: as (i) dyadic relation of two ideas and as (ii) triadic relation of object, sign and idea which is by this sign determined. First perspective emphasizes the socio-cultural construction of subject and is rooted in the view of sign as language/system unit, second one emphasizes the necessary effects of "reality" in the actions and productions of signs. Despite the impossibility of translation between structuralism and semiotic, these two standpoints has in common the desubjectification of self and I would like to explore some consequences of this challenging schism.

Název v anglickém jazyce

De-Subjectification in Semiotics: Argumentations, Self-Defense and Signs of Opposing Forces

Popis výsledku anglicky

In this reflection I would like to consider some effects of selected semiologic and semiotic perspectives on persuasion and subjectivity interconnected to general semiotics and theoretical rhetorics. I will argue that there are two possible ways how to "unravel the tangled skein" of some of these interconnections (between semiotic and rhetorical structure of the subject). We can find them inside two basic paradigms of semiotics: first (i) in semiology and (mostly Foucauldian) structuralism and the second (ii) in (mostly Peircean) semiotic. These two methodological viewpoints take as their point of departure general relation which is sign, but in completely different manner: as (i) dyadic relation of two ideas and as (ii) triadic relation of object, sign and idea which is by this sign determined. First perspective emphasizes the socio-cultural construction of subject and is rooted in the view of sign as language/system unit, second one emphasizes the necessary effects of "reality" in the actions and productions of signs. Despite the impossibility of translation between structuralism and semiotic, these two standpoints has in common the desubjectification of self and I would like to explore some consequences of this challenging schism.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Pragmatism Today

ISSN

1338-2799

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

7

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

SK - Slovenská republika

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

95-109

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—