Violence and Existence, An Examination of Karl Schmitt's Philosophy

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F17%3A10368199" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/17:10368199 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11007-016-9410-4" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11007-016-9410-4</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11007-016-9410-4" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11007-016-9410-4</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Violence and Existence, An Examination of Karl Schmitt's Philosophy

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

On August 22,1933, Heidegger wrote to Carl Schmitt, &quot;Thank you for having sent me your text [The Concept of the Political], which I already knew in the second edition and which contains an approach of the greatest importance. I would be most appreciative if I could speak with you about this personally some day.&quot; The newly appointed Rector then invites Schmitt to collaborate with him in rebuilding the Faculty of Law. What was behind this praise for his book (which originally appeared in the same year as Being and Time)? What was the reason for the invitation? Both philosophers were equally critical of liberalism and democratic politics. Both had joined the Nazi party in 1933 and both had benefited from it in terms of their careers. Beyond this, however, there was a deeper, philosophical connection. For all his claimed affinity with Hobbes, Schmitt, in fact, radicalizes and transforms the tradition that follows from him. At the basis of this transformation is a conception of human existence, one that Schmitt shares with Heidegger. In this article, I first analyze this conception and then present an alternative conception, one stemming from the Czech philosopher, Jan Patočka, to show how it, rather than Schmitt&apos;s, opens up the possibility of political life.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Violence and Existence, An Examination of Karl Schmitt's Philosophy

Popis výsledku anglicky

On August 22,1933, Heidegger wrote to Carl Schmitt, &quot;Thank you for having sent me your text [The Concept of the Political], which I already knew in the second edition and which contains an approach of the greatest importance. I would be most appreciative if I could speak with you about this personally some day.&quot; The newly appointed Rector then invites Schmitt to collaborate with him in rebuilding the Faculty of Law. What was behind this praise for his book (which originally appeared in the same year as Being and Time)? What was the reason for the invitation? Both philosophers were equally critical of liberalism and democratic politics. Both had joined the Nazi party in 1933 and both had benefited from it in terms of their careers. Beyond this, however, there was a deeper, philosophical connection. For all his claimed affinity with Hobbes, Schmitt, in fact, radicalizes and transforms the tradition that follows from him. At the basis of this transformation is a conception of human existence, one that Schmitt shares with Heidegger. In this article, I first analyze this conception and then present an alternative conception, one stemming from the Czech philosopher, Jan Patočka, to show how it, rather than Schmitt&apos;s, opens up the possibility of political life.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Continental Philosophy Review

ISSN

1387-2842

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

50

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

249-268

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85011288770