Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Changes In Contemporary Attitudes In Critical Architecture And The Notion Of Lateness

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F22%3A10441028" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/22:10441028 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://smartart-conference.rs/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Zbornik-SmartArt2021.pdf" target="_blank" >https://smartart-conference.rs/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Zbornik-SmartArt2021.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Changes In Contemporary Attitudes In Critical Architecture And The Notion Of Lateness

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The aim of this paper is to present an inquiry into critical architecture by architect Peter Eisenman and various ways how to reach criticality in architecture; as well as a few examples presenting aspects of application of criticality in architecture. In particular the paper presents the last stage of the evolving investigation of criticality that was brought in the 2020 book called Lateness that offers crystallization of Eisenman&apos;s attitude toward the topic. Criticality and critical architecture are defined in accordance with theoretician K. Hays as such an architecture or attitude that does not serve blindly to mainstream power/dominant culture but on the other hand does not withdraw from the world to a purely formal structure disengaged from the contingencies of place and time. Critical architecture remains between these two extremities. As next the paper explains various ways into criticality. In long period it was a diagram that ensured criticality. But in the last period there emerged a new term and a new proposition. And this is lateness. Lateness, inspired from a study of late Beethoven&apos;s composition by Adorno, is a term used by Eisenman to designate (pieces of) architecture in which form or fragments of form are problematically related to their time determination. Form of a building consists of fragments (parts) that couldn&apos;t be determined in terms of style or period of time. What is important in this context is that criticality doesn&apos;t &quot;dwell&quot; in the form itself (that was the case in various previous stages). Criticality involve now relationship between form and time. Lateness is presented as a reaction to contemporary architecture.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Changes In Contemporary Attitudes In Critical Architecture And The Notion Of Lateness

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The aim of this paper is to present an inquiry into critical architecture by architect Peter Eisenman and various ways how to reach criticality in architecture; as well as a few examples presenting aspects of application of criticality in architecture. In particular the paper presents the last stage of the evolving investigation of criticality that was brought in the 2020 book called Lateness that offers crystallization of Eisenman&apos;s attitude toward the topic. Criticality and critical architecture are defined in accordance with theoretician K. Hays as such an architecture or attitude that does not serve blindly to mainstream power/dominant culture but on the other hand does not withdraw from the world to a purely formal structure disengaged from the contingencies of place and time. Critical architecture remains between these two extremities. As next the paper explains various ways into criticality. In long period it was a diagram that ensured criticality. But in the last period there emerged a new term and a new proposition. And this is lateness. Lateness, inspired from a study of late Beethoven&apos;s composition by Adorno, is a term used by Eisenman to designate (pieces of) architecture in which form or fragments of form are problematically related to their time determination. Form of a building consists of fragments (parts) that couldn&apos;t be determined in terms of style or period of time. What is important in this context is that criticality doesn&apos;t &quot;dwell&quot; in the form itself (that was the case in various previous stages). Criticality involve now relationship between form and time. Lateness is presented as a reaction to contemporary architecture.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2022

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    Art and Science Applied: Experience and Vision

  • ISBN

    978-86-80245-45-4

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Počet stran výsledku

    14

  • Strana od-do

    119-132

  • Název nakladatele

    University of Arts in Belgrade, Faculty of Applied Arts

  • Místo vydání

    Bělehrad

  • Místo konání akce

    Belgrade

  • Datum konání akce

    23. 9. 2021

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    EUR - Evropská akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku