Comparison of Quality Measures for Building Outline Extraction

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11310%2F16%3A10326265" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11310/16:10326265 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phor.12144" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phor.12144</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phor.12144" target="_blank" >10.1111/phor.12144</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of Quality Measures for Building Outline Extraction

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

To date, numerous automatic building detection methods using lidar data have been developed. However, in most cases the parameters used for the evaluation of the results are not specified, accuracy assessment results cannot be readily compared or no result evaluation is performed at all. In this study, accuracy assessment aspects have been analysed in order to find a generally applicable approach for the comparison of building outline extraction methods. An area-based evaluation of accuracy has been selected as the most suitable due to its robustness, predictability and comparability between datasets. This assessment can be further supplemented with both object- and area-based evaluations, procured solely with those buildings that were classified as true positives, in order to interpret the extraction results in more detail. In cases where a reference dataset of superior quality (such as low-altitude aerial imagery) is available, an absolute accuracy evaluation is also relevant.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of Quality Measures for Building Outline Extraction

Popis výsledku anglicky

To date, numerous automatic building detection methods using lidar data have been developed. However, in most cases the parameters used for the evaluation of the results are not specified, accuracy assessment results cannot be readily compared or no result evaluation is performed at all. In this study, accuracy assessment aspects have been analysed in order to find a generally applicable approach for the comparison of building outline extraction methods. An area-based evaluation of accuracy has been selected as the most suitable due to its robustness, predictability and comparability between datasets. This assessment can be further supplemented with both object- and area-based evaluations, procured solely with those buildings that were classified as true positives, in order to interpret the extraction results in more detail. In cases where a reference dataset of superior quality (such as low-altitude aerial imagery) is available, an absolute accuracy evaluation is also relevant.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

DE - Zemský magnetismus, geodesie, geografie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Photogrammetric Record

ISSN

0031-868X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

31

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

154

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

193-209

Kód UT WoS článku

000379368400005

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—