Artificial field defects: A low-cost measure to support arthropod diversity in arable fields
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11310%2F22%3A10454463" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11310/22:10454463 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/60460709:41330/22:88477
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=XLuZ3tBXnB" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=XLuZ3tBXnB</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107748" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.agee.2021.107748</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Artificial field defects: A low-cost measure to support arthropod diversity in arable fields
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Biodiversity is rapidly declining worldwide, with agricultural intensification being among the main drivers of this process. Effective conservation measures in agricultural landscapes are therefore urgently needed. Here we introduce a novel low-cost conservation measure called artificial field defects, i.e., areas where crop is not sown and spontaneous vegetation grows. To evaluate their biodiversity potential, we compared abundance and species richness of various arthropod taxa between artificially created field defects and control plots within oilseed rape (OSR) fields. The effectiveness of field defects to support biodiversity was examined using an experiment with a factorial design comparing OSR flowering and ripening phases, location of field defects (field edge vs interior) and field defect type (sown with a nectar-rich plant vs no sowing). Arthropod sampling was conducted by employing several complementary methods: pitfall trapping, pan trapping, sweep netting and individual counting. Butterflies, true bugs, bees and wasps were more abundant and species-rich in both types of defects than in OSR controls. In contrast, ground-dwelling taxa had more individuals and species in controls. Overall, arthropod abundance and species richness increased, and field defects became relatively more attractive, during OSR ripening compared to OSR flowering. Location of defects had little effect, with only butterfly and spider assemblages being more abundant and species-rich at field edges compared to interiors. Our data indicate that artificial field defects can provide a simple agri-environmental measure to support various arthropod groups. However, further studies are needed to assess their biodiversity value at the landscape scale, and evaluate the balance between costs and benefits for farmers.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Artificial field defects: A low-cost measure to support arthropod diversity in arable fields
Popis výsledku anglicky
Biodiversity is rapidly declining worldwide, with agricultural intensification being among the main drivers of this process. Effective conservation measures in agricultural landscapes are therefore urgently needed. Here we introduce a novel low-cost conservation measure called artificial field defects, i.e., areas where crop is not sown and spontaneous vegetation grows. To evaluate their biodiversity potential, we compared abundance and species richness of various arthropod taxa between artificially created field defects and control plots within oilseed rape (OSR) fields. The effectiveness of field defects to support biodiversity was examined using an experiment with a factorial design comparing OSR flowering and ripening phases, location of field defects (field edge vs interior) and field defect type (sown with a nectar-rich plant vs no sowing). Arthropod sampling was conducted by employing several complementary methods: pitfall trapping, pan trapping, sweep netting and individual counting. Butterflies, true bugs, bees and wasps were more abundant and species-rich in both types of defects than in OSR controls. In contrast, ground-dwelling taxa had more individuals and species in controls. Overall, arthropod abundance and species richness increased, and field defects became relatively more attractive, during OSR ripening compared to OSR flowering. Location of defects had little effect, with only butterfly and spider assemblages being more abundant and species-rich at field edges compared to interiors. Our data indicate that artificial field defects can provide a simple agri-environmental measure to support various arthropod groups. However, further studies are needed to assess their biodiversity value at the landscape scale, and evaluate the balance between costs and benefits for farmers.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10613 - Zoology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
ISSN
0167-8809
e-ISSN
1873-2305
Svazek periodika
325
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
February
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
107748
Kód UT WoS článku
000719278300009
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85118555663