Lost in Interpreting: Speech Translation from Source or Interpreter?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F21%3A10440560" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/21:10440560 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/pdfs/interspeech_2021/machacek21_interspeech.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/pdfs/interspeech_2021/machacek21_interspeech.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2021-2232" target="_blank" >10.21437/Interspeech.2021-2232</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Lost in Interpreting: Speech Translation from Source or Interpreter?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Interpreters facilitate multi-lingual meetings but the affordable set of languages is often smaller than what is needed. Automatic simultaneous speech translation can extend the set of provided languages. We investigate if such an automatic system should rather follow the original speaker, or an interpreter to achieve better translation quality at the cost of increased delay. To answer the question, we release Europarl Simultaneous Interpreting Corpus (ESIC), 10 hours of recordings and transcripts of European Parliament speeches in English, with simultaneous interpreting into Czech and German. We evaluate quality and latency of speaker-based and interpreter-based spoken translation systems from English to Czech. We study the differences in implicit simplification and summarization of the human interpreter compared to a machine translation system trained to shorten the output to some extent. Finally, we perform human evaluation to measure information loss of each of these approaches.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Lost in Interpreting: Speech Translation from Source or Interpreter?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Interpreters facilitate multi-lingual meetings but the affordable set of languages is often smaller than what is needed. Automatic simultaneous speech translation can extend the set of provided languages. We investigate if such an automatic system should rather follow the original speaker, or an interpreter to achieve better translation quality at the cost of increased delay. To answer the question, we release Europarl Simultaneous Interpreting Corpus (ESIC), 10 hours of recordings and transcripts of European Parliament speeches in English, with simultaneous interpreting into Czech and German. We evaluate quality and latency of speaker-based and interpreter-based spoken translation systems from English to Czech. We study the differences in implicit simplification and summarization of the human interpreter compared to a machine translation system trained to shorten the output to some extent. Finally, we perform human evaluation to measure information loss of each of these approaches.

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GX19-26934X" target="_blank" >GX19-26934X: Neuronové reprezentace v multimodálním a mnohojazyčném modelování</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů