Reading text aloud benefits memory but not comprehension

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F23%3A4HH7SD72" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/23:4HH7SD72 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85164735555&doi=10.3758%2fs13421-023-01442-2&partnerID=40&md5=fcbb1f52665f78ccf8b1b449b200e4df" target="_blank" >https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85164735555&doi=10.3758%2fs13421-023-01442-2&partnerID=40&md5=fcbb1f52665f78ccf8b1b449b200e4df</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-023-01442-2" target="_blank" >10.3758/s13421-023-01442-2</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Reading text aloud benefits memory but not comprehension

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

"The production effect—that reading aloud leads to better memory than does reading silently—has been defined narrowly with reference to memory; it has been explored largely using word lists as the material to be read and remembered. But might the benefit of production extend beyond memory and beyond individual words? In a series of four experiments, passages from reading comprehension tests served as the study material. Participants read some passages aloud and others silently. After each passage, they completed multiple-choice questions about that passage. Separating the multiple-choice questions into memory-focused versus comprehension-focused questions, we observed a consistent production benefit only for the memory-focused questions. Production clearly improves memory for text, not just for individual words, and also extends to multiple-choice testing. The overall pattern of findings fits with the distinctiveness account of production—that information read aloud stands out at study and at test from information read silently. Only when the tested information is a very close match to the studied information, as is the case for memory questions but not for comprehension questions, does production improve accuracy. © 2023, The Psychonomic Society, Inc."

Název v anglickém jazyce

Reading text aloud benefits memory but not comprehension

Popis výsledku anglicky

"The production effect—that reading aloud leads to better memory than does reading silently—has been defined narrowly with reference to memory; it has been explored largely using word lists as the material to be read and remembered. But might the benefit of production extend beyond memory and beyond individual words? In a series of four experiments, passages from reading comprehension tests served as the study material. Participants read some passages aloud and others silently. After each passage, they completed multiple-choice questions about that passage. Separating the multiple-choice questions into memory-focused versus comprehension-focused questions, we observed a consistent production benefit only for the memory-focused questions. Production clearly improves memory for text, not just for individual words, and also extends to multiple-choice testing. The overall pattern of findings fits with the distinctiveness account of production—that information read aloud stands out at study and at test from information read silently. Only when the tested information is a very close match to the studied information, as is the case for memory questions but not for comprehension questions, does production improve accuracy. © 2023, The Psychonomic Society, Inc."

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

—

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

"Memory and Cognition"

ISSN

0090-502X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

""

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2023

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

1-16

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85164735555