The Use of English Pragmatic Markers by Learners of English in Interlanguage Communication

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F25%3A3FDKJEQ7" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/25:3FDKJEQ7 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85173741471&doi=10.17507%2ftpls.1310.24&partnerID=40&md5=fabcbae60cb72b4972db357f1c64a44a" target="_blank" >https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85173741471&doi=10.17507%2ftpls.1310.24&partnerID=40&md5=fabcbae60cb72b4972db357f1c64a44a</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1310.24" target="_blank" >10.17507/tpls.1310.24</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Use of English Pragmatic Markers by Learners of English in Interlanguage Communication

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This research examined two interpersonal-centered pragmatic markers, well and you know, used by Thai ESL learners at two levels of English proficiency. It used a quantitative approach to determine the difference in the use of the two pragmatic markers between the two proficiency levels, and it used a qualitative approach to identify each function of the two pragmatic markers. From an examination of the use of the two pragmatic markers by 60 Thai ESL learners, this research found a significant difference of using well between the two proficiency levels, while no significant difference of using you know between the two proficiency levels. This finding indicates a dissimilarity of the use of the English pragmatic markers by Thai ESL learners in interlanguage communication. The analysis of the pragmatic functions used by Thai ESL learners in this research suggested that a more limited range was used compared to previous research. Finally, this research found no significant difference in the use of each function of both pragmatic markers, which can be explained by the rare use of both pragmatic markers and their pragmatic functions by Thai ESL learners. Overall, the findings revealed that Thai ESL learners had a deficiency in the use of the pragmatic markers in interlanguage communication in English, which may lead to a lack of pragmatic competence among Thai ESL learners. © 2023 ACADEMY PUBLICATION.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Use of English Pragmatic Markers by Learners of English in Interlanguage Communication

Popis výsledku anglicky

This research examined two interpersonal-centered pragmatic markers, well and you know, used by Thai ESL learners at two levels of English proficiency. It used a quantitative approach to determine the difference in the use of the two pragmatic markers between the two proficiency levels, and it used a qualitative approach to identify each function of the two pragmatic markers. From an examination of the use of the two pragmatic markers by 60 Thai ESL learners, this research found a significant difference of using well between the two proficiency levels, while no significant difference of using you know between the two proficiency levels. This finding indicates a dissimilarity of the use of the English pragmatic markers by Thai ESL learners in interlanguage communication. The analysis of the pragmatic functions used by Thai ESL learners in this research suggested that a more limited range was used compared to previous research. Finally, this research found no significant difference in the use of each function of both pragmatic markers, which can be explained by the rare use of both pragmatic markers and their pragmatic functions by Thai ESL learners. Overall, the findings revealed that Thai ESL learners had a deficiency in the use of the pragmatic markers in interlanguage communication in English, which may lead to a lack of pragmatic competence among Thai ESL learners. © 2023 ACADEMY PUBLICATION.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

—

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Theory and Practice in Language Studies

ISSN

17992591

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

13

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

10

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

2652 - 2662

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85173741471