Alternations (at) that time: NP versus PP time adjuncts in the history of English

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F25%3ABHJSIJQ2" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/25:BHJSIJQ2 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2023-0054/html" target="_blank" >https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2023-0054/html</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2023-0054" target="_blank" >10.1515/lingvan-2023-0054</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Alternations (at) that time: NP versus PP time adjuncts in the history of English

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Abstract The present paper investigates variation between nominal and prepositional adjuncts of time as in, for example, [on] that day, they left. The main goals are (i) to assess potential changes in the distribution of these variants in the history of English, specifically from Middle English to Late Modern English (1150–1914), and (ii) to test which factors most strongly impact the choice between the two variants, with a focus on the impact of different complexity measures. To address these questions, the paper makes use of data from the Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpora of Historical English (PPCME2; PPCEME; PPCMBE), explored by means of logistic regression modelling. The results suggest that there is no dramatic, sweeping change in this abstract alternation over time, but that this variation may mainly plays out on lower, noun-specific levels.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Alternations (at) that time: NP versus PP time adjuncts in the history of English

Popis výsledku anglicky

Abstract The present paper investigates variation between nominal and prepositional adjuncts of time as in, for example, [on] that day, they left. The main goals are (i) to assess potential changes in the distribution of these variants in the history of English, specifically from Middle English to Late Modern English (1150–1914), and (ii) to test which factors most strongly impact the choice between the two variants, with a focus on the impact of different complexity measures. To address these questions, the paper makes use of data from the Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpora of Historical English (PPCME2; PPCEME; PPCMBE), explored by means of logistic regression modelling. The results suggest that there is no dramatic, sweeping change in this abstract alternation over time, but that this variation may mainly plays out on lower, noun-specific levels.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

—

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Linguistics Vanguard

ISSN

2199-174X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

10

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

s1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

19-28

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—