Database of aspect triplets in Polish, Czech and Russian: presentation, considerations and case studies
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F26%3A66LTPVFI" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/26:66LTPVFI - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-024-09310-6" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-024-09310-6</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11185-024-09310-6" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11185-024-09310-6</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Database of aspect triplets in Polish, Czech and Russian: presentation, considerations and case studies
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The article discusses the significance of (bi-imperfective) aspect triplets in the aspect systems of Slavic languages, concerning both their status in the contemporary stages and their significance in the evolution of these systems. From either of these perspectives, the determination of aspect triplets crucially hinges on the role assigned to Natural Perfectives, i.e. perfective stems whose prefixes show some semantic overlap with meaning components of unprefixed (i.e. simplex) imperfective stems. Another crucial point to be accounted for is whether secondary imperfectives (IPFV2), i.e. stems derived with suffixes from prefixed perfective stems, really oust imperfective simplex stems (IPFV1) in their lexical relation to Natural Perfectives. A closer look at diachronic facts shows that this need not be the case; in fact, it has often not been the case, and a triplet relation between two imperfective stems and a perfective stem (with the latter serving as semantic and morphological pivot) is by no means deemed to be instable.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Database of aspect triplets in Polish, Czech and Russian: presentation, considerations and case studies
Popis výsledku anglicky
The article discusses the significance of (bi-imperfective) aspect triplets in the aspect systems of Slavic languages, concerning both their status in the contemporary stages and their significance in the evolution of these systems. From either of these perspectives, the determination of aspect triplets crucially hinges on the role assigned to Natural Perfectives, i.e. perfective stems whose prefixes show some semantic overlap with meaning components of unprefixed (i.e. simplex) imperfective stems. Another crucial point to be accounted for is whether secondary imperfectives (IPFV2), i.e. stems derived with suffixes from prefixed perfective stems, really oust imperfective simplex stems (IPFV1) in their lexical relation to Natural Perfectives. A closer look at diachronic facts shows that this need not be the case; in fact, it has often not been the case, and a triplet relation between two imperfective stems and a perfective stem (with the latter serving as semantic and morphological pivot) is by no means deemed to be instable.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
—
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Russian Linguistics
ISSN
1572-8714
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
49
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
37
Strana od-do
1-37
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—