Database of aspect triplets in Polish, Czech and Russian: presentation, considerations and case studies

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A90244%2F25%3A10495750" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:90244/25:10495750 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Pdf7tzdi7z" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Pdf7tzdi7z</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11185-024-09310-6" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11185-024-09310-6</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Database of aspect triplets in Polish, Czech and Russian: presentation, considerations and case studies

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

he article discusses the significance of (bi-imperfective) aspect triplets in the aspect systems of Slavic languages, concerning both their status in the contemporary stages and their significance in the evolution of these systems. From either of these perspectives, the determination of aspect triplets crucially hinges on the role assigned to Natural Perfectives, i.e. perfective stems whose prefixes show some semantic overlap with meaning components of unprefixed (i.e. simplex) imperfective stems. Another crucial point to be accounted for is whether secondary imperfectives (IPFV2), i.e. stems derived with suffixes from prefixed perfective stems, really oust imperfective simplex stems (IPFV1) in their lexical relation to Natural Perfectives. A closer look at diachronic facts shows that this need not be the case; in fact, it has often not been the case, and a triplet relation between two imperfective stems and a perfective stem (with the latter serving as semantic and morphological pivot) is by no means deemed to be instable.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Database of aspect triplets in Polish, Czech and Russian: presentation, considerations and case studies

Popis výsledku anglicky

he article discusses the significance of (bi-imperfective) aspect triplets in the aspect systems of Slavic languages, concerning both their status in the contemporary stages and their significance in the evolution of these systems. From either of these perspectives, the determination of aspect triplets crucially hinges on the role assigned to Natural Perfectives, i.e. perfective stems whose prefixes show some semantic overlap with meaning components of unprefixed (i.e. simplex) imperfective stems. Another crucial point to be accounted for is whether secondary imperfectives (IPFV2), i.e. stems derived with suffixes from prefixed perfective stems, really oust imperfective simplex stems (IPFV1) in their lexical relation to Natural Perfectives. A closer look at diachronic facts shows that this need not be the case; in fact, it has often not been the case, and a triplet relation between two imperfective stems and a perfective stem (with the latter serving as semantic and morphological pivot) is by no means deemed to be instable.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60203 - Linguistics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

—

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Russian Linguistics

ISSN

0304-3487

e-ISSN

1572-8714

Svazek periodika

49

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

37

Strana od-do

1-37

Kód UT WoS článku

001403169600001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85218140083