Support verbs that are not verbs

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F26%3ACS8J9A3W" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/26:CS8J9A3W - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2025.101741" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2025.101741</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2025.101741" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.langsci.2025.101741</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Support verbs that are not verbs

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In support verb constructions (SVC), as have poise, the support verb is explicitly assumed to be a verb, here have. However, during the last 50 years, the notion of SVC has been extended to a large range of new cases. With this new scope, the linguistic form that plays the role of the support verb can also be an expression not classified as a verb, such as be mad with, or an adjective, e.g. 있다 issta ‘there is’ in Korean. Calling ‘support verb’ a non-verb is a terminological issue. Beyond that, this article examines the validity of extending the definition of SVCs. After surveying the linguistic forms at stake and the reactions to such extension, we focus on delimiting the historical, stricto sensu SVCs based on criteria, in a way that matches the traditional intuition. Then, for each type of linguistic form proposed as an extension, we examine how far the extension distorts this notion. We find both SVCs and extensions of SVC to be of interest in a model of syntax and the lexicon. Finally, the ‘verb’ part of speech is not essential to any of the categories, which suggests adopting the terms of ‘support construction’ and ‘extension of support construction’ instead. © 2025 The Author(s)

Název v anglickém jazyce

Support verbs that are not verbs

Popis výsledku anglicky

In support verb constructions (SVC), as have poise, the support verb is explicitly assumed to be a verb, here have. However, during the last 50 years, the notion of SVC has been extended to a large range of new cases. With this new scope, the linguistic form that plays the role of the support verb can also be an expression not classified as a verb, such as be mad with, or an adjective, e.g. 있다 issta ‘there is’ in Korean. Calling ‘support verb’ a non-verb is a terminological issue. Beyond that, this article examines the validity of extending the definition of SVCs. After surveying the linguistic forms at stake and the reactions to such extension, we focus on delimiting the historical, stricto sensu SVCs based on criteria, in a way that matches the traditional intuition. Then, for each type of linguistic form proposed as an extension, we examine how far the extension distorts this notion. We find both SVCs and extensions of SVC to be of interest in a model of syntax and the lexicon. Finally, the ‘verb’ part of speech is not essential to any of the categories, which suggests adopting the terms of ‘support construction’ and ‘extension of support construction’ instead. © 2025 The Author(s)

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

—

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Language Sciences

ISSN

0388-0001

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

111

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2025

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

29

Strana od-do

101741

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105008893317