International Employment Statistics for People With Intellectual Disability-The Case for Common Metrics

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11410%2F15%3A10294847" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11410/15:10294847 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12113" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12113</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12113" target="_blank" >10.1111/jppi.12113</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

International Employment Statistics for People With Intellectual Disability-The Case for Common Metrics

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The World Report on Disability identifies employment as an important element of social participation. The Report also points to the need for research that crosses national boundaries to identify and address central areas of concern. However, such effortsare hampered with respect to intellectual disability (ID) by inconsistencies in the population definitions used, the definition of employment bor employability, and metrics of employment participation. The authors explore the varied ways in which employment participation rates for people with ID are determined and reported in jurisdictions around the world, and note that with respect to employment metrics, there remains substantial variation in the methods used in data collection and reporting across agencies and countries. They also note that close inspection of methodologies is required in order to interpret data from any official statistical agency (as even when methods and definitions are explicit, the variations in approaches make

Název v anglickém jazyce

International Employment Statistics for People With Intellectual Disability-The Case for Common Metrics

Popis výsledku anglicky

The World Report on Disability identifies employment as an important element of social participation. The Report also points to the need for research that crosses national boundaries to identify and address central areas of concern. However, such effortsare hampered with respect to intellectual disability (ID) by inconsistencies in the population definitions used, the definition of employment bor employability, and metrics of employment participation. The authors explore the varied ways in which employment participation rates for people with ID are determined and reported in jurisdictions around the world, and note that with respect to employment metrics, there remains substantial variation in the methods used in data collection and reporting across agencies and countries. They also note that close inspection of methodologies is required in order to interpret data from any official statistical agency (as even when methods and definitions are explicit, the variations in approaches make

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AO - Sociologie, demografie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GAP407%2F11%2F2009" target="_blank" >GAP407/11/2009: Kvalitativní monitoring efektů vybraných institucionálních procesů v životě mladých dospělých se zdravotním postižením</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities [online]

ISSN

1741-1130

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

12

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

112-119

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—