. Approaches to Spondylotic Cervical Myelopathy: Conservative vs Surgical Results in a Three-year Follow-up Study

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F02%3A00008550" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/02:00008550 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

. Approaches to Spondylotic Cervical Myelopathy: Conservative vs Surgical Results in a Three-year Follow-up Study

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Study Design: A 3-year prospective randomised study. Objectives: To compare conservative and operative treatments of mild and moderate, non-progressive, or slowly progressive, forms of SCM. Methods: Sixty-eight patients were randomised into two groups. Group A, treated conservatively, consisted of 35 subjects, while group B, treated surgically, was made up of 33 patients. Results: There was, on average, no significant deterioration in mJOA score within the two groups over 3 years of follow-up, but therewas a slightly expressed decrease in the self-evaluation score in group B, and a slight deterioration of the score for daily activities in group A. Comparison of the two groups showed significant difference in the timed 10 m walk test in favour of groupA, but no difference in mJOA score and self evaluation by patients themselves (with the exception of a better score at month 6 in favour of group B). Conclusions: The 3-year follow-up study did not show, on average, that the surgery is s

Název v anglickém jazyce

. Approaches to Spondylotic Cervical Myelopathy: Conservative vs Surgical Results in a Three-year Follow-up Study

Popis výsledku anglicky

Study Design: A 3-year prospective randomised study. Objectives: To compare conservative and operative treatments of mild and moderate, non-progressive, or slowly progressive, forms of SCM. Methods: Sixty-eight patients were randomised into two groups. Group A, treated conservatively, consisted of 35 subjects, while group B, treated surgically, was made up of 33 patients. Results: There was, on average, no significant deterioration in mJOA score within the two groups over 3 years of follow-up, but therewas a slightly expressed decrease in the self-evaluation score in group B, and a slight deterioration of the score for daily activities in group A. Comparison of the two groups showed significant difference in the timed 10 m walk test in favour of groupA, but no difference in mJOA score and self evaluation by patients themselves (with the exception of a better score at month 6 in favour of group B). Conclusions: The 3-year follow-up study did not show, on average, that the surgery is s

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FH - Neurologie, neurochirurgie, neurovědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/NF6521" target="_blank" >NF6521: Stanovení predikčních faktorů výsledku konservativní nebo chirurgické léčby spondylogenní cervikální myelopatie</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2002

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Spine

ISSN

0362-2436

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

27

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

20

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

2205-2211

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—