Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment after 10 years

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14740%2F11%3A00053467" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14740/11:00053467 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1811-9" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1811-9</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1811-9" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00586-011-1811-9</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment after 10 years

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

It is not known whether the results of decompressive surgery to treat the mild and moderate forms of spondylotic cervical myelopathy (CSM) are any better than those of a conservative approach. A 10-year prospective randomised study was performed. The objective of the study was to compare conservative and operative treatments of mild and moderate, non-progressive, or slowly progressive, forms of CSM. Sixty-four patients were randomised into two groups of 32. Group A was treated conservatively while groupB was treated surgically. The clinical outcome was evaluated by modified JOA score, timed 10-m walk, score of daily activities recorded by video and evaluated by two observers blinded to the type of therapy, and by subjective assessment by the patientsthemselves. Seventeen patents died of natural, unrelated causes, during the follow-up. A total of 25 patients in the conservatively and 22 in the surgically treated group were used for the final evaluation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment after 10 years

Popis výsledku anglicky

It is not known whether the results of decompressive surgery to treat the mild and moderate forms of spondylotic cervical myelopathy (CSM) are any better than those of a conservative approach. A 10-year prospective randomised study was performed. The objective of the study was to compare conservative and operative treatments of mild and moderate, non-progressive, or slowly progressive, forms of CSM. Sixty-four patients were randomised into two groups of 32. Group A was treated conservatively while groupB was treated surgically. The clinical outcome was evaluated by modified JOA score, timed 10-m walk, score of daily activities recorded by video and evaluated by two observers blinded to the type of therapy, and by subjective assessment by the patientsthemselves. Seventeen patents died of natural, unrelated causes, during the follow-up. A total of 25 patients in the conservatively and 22 in the surgically treated group were used for the final evaluation.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FH - Neurologie, neurochirurgie, neurovědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2011

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Spine Journal

ISSN

0940-6719

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

20

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

9

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

1533-1538

Kód UT WoS článku

000294706700017

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—