Effect of ureterointestinal anastomosis on renal function and morbidity in intestinal urinary diversion

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F13%3A00069740" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/13:00069740 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2012.732110" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2012.732110</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2012.732110" target="_blank" >10.3109/00365599.2012.732110</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Effect of ureterointestinal anastomosis on renal function and morbidity in intestinal urinary diversion

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objective.The authors previously successfully applied the "flap-and-trough" (FT) method of antireflux ureterointestinal anastomosis (UIA) in a pilot set of 81 patients. This randomized prospective trial tested the effectiveness of this method in protecting the upper urinary tract from obstruction, reflux and infections. Material and methods. Forty-nine patients indicated for cystectomy and intestinal urinary diversion were randomly split into two groups, A and B. The FT antireflux UIA was applied in group A (n = 20), and refluxing direct elliptical UIA in group B (n = 29). Both groups were divided into two subcategories according to the type of diversion used: Ar (n = 10) and Br (n = 16) with low-pressure reservoirs and Ac (n = 10) and Bc (n = 13) withconduits. The follow-up evaluation compared the groups regarding perioperative complications, antireflux efficiency of FT, occurrence of obstruction and urinary infection, kidney morphology and glomerular filtration rate. Results.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Effect of ureterointestinal anastomosis on renal function and morbidity in intestinal urinary diversion

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objective.The authors previously successfully applied the "flap-and-trough" (FT) method of antireflux ureterointestinal anastomosis (UIA) in a pilot set of 81 patients. This randomized prospective trial tested the effectiveness of this method in protecting the upper urinary tract from obstruction, reflux and infections. Material and methods. Forty-nine patients indicated for cystectomy and intestinal urinary diversion were randomly split into two groups, A and B. The FT antireflux UIA was applied in group A (n = 20), and refluxing direct elliptical UIA in group B (n = 29). Both groups were divided into two subcategories according to the type of diversion used: Ar (n = 10) and Br (n = 16) with low-pressure reservoirs and Ac (n = 10) and Bc (n = 13) withconduits. The follow-up evaluation compared the groups regarding perioperative complications, antireflux efficiency of FT, occurrence of obstruction and urinary infection, kidney morphology and glomerular filtration rate. Results.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FE - Ostatní obory vnitřního lékařství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

ISSN

2168-1805

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

47

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

225-229

Kód UT WoS článku

000321415400010

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—